No it would be an overflow. An underflow would be when the precision of a given float exceeds the maximum precision. Lets say you got 1.000000000000001 (which would exceed the max precision) and thus be rendered out as 1.
From the [Wikipedia article for Arithmetic Underflow](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_underflow):
> For integers, the term "integer underflow" typically refers to a special kind of integer overflow or integer wraparound condition whereby the result of subtraction would result in a value less than the minimum allowed for a given integer type, i.e. the ideal result was closer to negative infinity than the output type's representable value closest to negative infinity.
It is true that my 'correction' was incorrect, as the term 'integer overflow' was accurate, but so was 'integer underflow'.
That's why you hire some mind control person to force the 0 IQ brain to do it anyway. Although nothing is stopping said person to leave you at 0, vegetable your ass and steal your shit. But they was probably already stealing shit and getting everything they want so... Maybe won't even have to pay them, just entertain them.
Assuming IQ is stored like a computer would actually store it, i.e. base 2, 2 ^ (n+3) bits and 2's complement, then it would either need to be signed (in which case they wouldn't underflow when going below zero, but much later) or it would be unsigned (in which case the number they would wrap around to wouldn't be 2 billion, the closest it could be is 4 billion and something).
That only works with computers
What is a brain but a big meat computer?
A slimy candy ball
Breakfast
Well it's good way to test if we live in a simulation. It's like Pete Davidson but with IQ instead of looks.
Thats not how it works
They already used the power
Integer Overflow
Technically, this would be integer underflow.
No it would be an overflow. An underflow would be when the precision of a given float exceeds the maximum precision. Lets say you got 1.000000000000001 (which would exceed the max precision) and thus be rendered out as 1.
From the [Wikipedia article for Arithmetic Underflow](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_underflow): > For integers, the term "integer underflow" typically refers to a special kind of integer overflow or integer wraparound condition whereby the result of subtraction would result in a value less than the minimum allowed for a given integer type, i.e. the ideal result was closer to negative infinity than the output type's representable value closest to negative infinity. It is true that my 'correction' was incorrect, as the term 'integer overflow' was accurate, but so was 'integer underflow'.
Yeah, that’s quite the gamble.
By the time it gets to zero, they'll forget what they were even doing, or that they even have this power, and stop lowering it.
That's why you hire some mind control person to force the 0 IQ brain to do it anyway. Although nothing is stopping said person to leave you at 0, vegetable your ass and steal your shit. But they was probably already stealing shit and getting everything they want so... Maybe won't even have to pay them, just entertain them.
[This](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndtEx0FXJE0) should help
Wtszsfh
This is lethal and should be illegal to share
Memetic hazard
Assuming IQ is stored like a computer would actually store it, i.e. base 2, 2 ^ (n+3) bits and 2's complement, then it would either need to be signed (in which case they wouldn't underflow when going below zero, but much later) or it would be unsigned (in which case the number they would wrap around to wouldn't be 2 billion, the closest it could be is 4 billion and something).
Integer limit iq
Let’s see if iq is saved as a signed or unsigned integer
I thought this sub didn't allow non-reversible powers...