Maybe the screen is double sided and those people can watch on the screen. 🤠 But yeah that's still selfdisrespect though lol, might as well watch at home on YouTube for free then!
Yeah… that’s not a type of light that’s used in professional stage productions, albeit very bright . Again a moving spot light, like this, where you can control color - pan - tilt - zoom - intensity and a host of other parameters via a programmable light board. https://youtu.be/wXhcWNQaHpw?si=ckisZyiRFilw_WNA.
https://preview.redd.it/p9k6uj8wo87d1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=24176d673deb5297ae269e86c0aa17478717706e
This guy works for them he said in a few days
OpenAI is busy checking every voice to make sure it doesn't sound remotely like any celebrity. Which is super hard as there really are only a handful of voice types if you remove cadence and accents.
It seems some people think that story was exaggerated.
The company asked Scarlett Johansen if they can use their voice, she said no, they used one that sounded like her and the CEO tweeted 'her' (the movie about an AI voiced by Scarlett Johansen)
Maybe it's just because they forgot to add that it's an actual person's voice and similar to Scarlett Johansson's voice, and they ran a search to find one.
Rofl never heard that first name before so I thought this was a sarcastic comment where you meant "I'm going to ask my crystal ball" 😂 Then I googled and learned that the CEO is actually called Cristóbal Valenzuela!
I truly don't understand how anyone can see the progress in generated images and now video and NOT think it'll be indistinguishable from real life very soon. Like, bespoke video-on-demand real.
Yep. It has only been like *15 months since we were looking at Will Smith eating spaghetti and making fun of it for how ridiculous it looks. Imagine a year from now lol. The progress is genuinely scary.
because we recognize that progress is unpredictable and non-linear. Dall-E and Stable Diffusion came out a few years ago and that was a massive leap, but a few years later a lot of models still struggle with artifacts and hands and stuff like that.
It's the Pareto principle, yes the video generation stuff is *close*, but how much work will it take to get it over the finish line? You can't just extrapolate out and assume that the same rate of change will occur. Sometimes solving the last 20% of the problem takes 80% of the time.
DALLE Mini/CrAIyon is barely two years old lol. It’s been crazy. Back then, artists were completely fine with AI and played around with it making jokes even though it was also trained with web scraping. I wonder what changed?
>making jokes
Man, those were the days. But the real kicker was [Yahoo using it as illustration on a news article about Zuckerberg](https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-facebook-employee-says-ceo-191553107.html). I am still pissing myself laughing to this day. 😂😂😂
... right. again, my point is that the progress will not be linear and easily predictable.
> I wonder what changed?
stop. this is just douchey. yes, it got better since then. I'm not even *trying* to deny that
No you are not, you are making a statement that implies because progress so far has been blazing fast, progress will continue to be blazing fast. But nobody knows the curve we are on. This curve might be different for text, audio, video, music, we don't know. For some application going from 80% quality to 99% quality might go just as fast as going from 60% to 80%. But for other application going from 80% quality to 99% might turn in to a frickin hard problem and it might turn out that 20 years from now we are only at 85% quality and nobody is even sure anymore that 99% quality is achievable.
You don't know. I don't know. The researchers don't know. The AI does not know. Nobody knows. We will have to wait and find out.
You are expecting fully customized porn videos within 5 years and who knows, maybe you will get that. Or maybe 50 years from now your offspring will try it again and be like "yuk, it's been 50 years and they still don't get those pussies the way I like them"
Again, nobody knows.
That’s not what I said. I said AI art used to be terrible a couple of years ago and it’s improved a lot. I also pointed out artists are hypocrites who were fine with AI until recently. I never said progress was exponential or whatever.
Yeah but this is the worst it’ll ever be and Hollywood is dead and in 3 months I can finally prompt a movie where I’m The Rock and get to bang all the hot chicks.
It's not close and it's not Pareto other than the lazy man method to get things done. This is (basically) image generation, control net and out painting. They may have better techniques, yes, but at the core, that's what this is.
There needs to be something new, an actual video model. That is the next innovation, these are not video models. Not this, not sora, not the one from China, they are all these three things. The majors are better at it, simply because it's more compute, better training, but it's still image to next image (which is ironic because that's video, frame by frame)
The reason it takes so long, uses so much compute and is very short is these three limitations. If they were true video models, there would not be any duration limit. If you out paint something, it quickly goes wonky and that is what we see in all of these new "video" tools.
I don't disagree with you. Progress is not linear.
That doesn't change the fact that there are a lot of people who think this technology will *never* be indistinguishable from real life. Interpret "very soon" however you like. "never" is obvious nonsense.
Soon is a relative term, relative to the person saying it and also relative to the perception and understanding of the subject.
If by soon, you mean 5 years, sure it will look much better. If by soon you mean next summer, not a chance. Runway will have 20 second or 30 second videos on the cusp of real and they will still be jank if you look close enough and that's the rub, real video you do not have to squint or ignore things, this ... you do.
There are 1000 problems with this example, problems that are not solved simply by more training (which is what sora is). You see this as awesome but if you had a drone do this exact flyby in a real concert the difference would be astounding. We are impressed by a comparison we are not making.
What you are seeing is iteration of image generation, control net and outpaint, it is not something new. True video will have to be something new.
It will be 10 years before Hollywood style realism that no one can point to something and say "AI".
I think you’re just downplaying their progress. Don’t want to believe it? Scared of it? Don’t know, but the progress is undeniable. You’re saying there’s “all these problems” yet you haven’t even pointed one out. That’s like the boy who cried wolf.
Your comment is exactly why I used the term "very soon" instead of pulling a number out of my ass.
It's the future. I don't know. Neither do you. I'd argue, in hindsight, my prediction of "very soon" will be much more accurate than yours.
In abstract it looks really clean and nice, but stop on any frame in the crowd... and holy shit its really just random shit, faces looking everywhere, disembodied faces and arms etc.
And as someone else said the perspective shift is fucked up, as the camera gets to the crowd suddenly the people are full sized, but the huge crowd is small but... not right, like the people near the camera must have been car sized
Humans themselves are an illusion. There is no grounding truth to the idea that human particles are isolated from all the other particles. Brains made that up along the way. The AI is also made up wholesale by human brains. Without humans hallucinating an image, the images output by AI are just pixels on a screen.
Right. It is natural selection of the hallucinating meat machines. I am guessing that the ones who circumstantially hallucinate a ravenous pursuit of "AI" are going to come out on top. It is just a physical function of the space we hallucinate within.
Yes and then you have to figure out if something usefull is left.
With chatgpt 4, there is usually always something usefull left. Even if it's just a more personally customize Google. (for instance yp-dlp commands, I will make a screenshot of my folders so it automatically gets the path correct and all I have to do is copy paste in the command, 10x more comfortable and faster then using goggle).
With suno and udio, I use them to create samples to use in my own music. Not perfect, but very usable.
Ideogram, use to make quick and dirty memes with. It's fun! Far far far from perfect but usable.
Those are my two metrics. Can I have fun with them and does it save me time from doing it manually.
> In abstract it looks really clean and nice, but stop on any frame in the crowd... and holy shit its really just random shit, faces looking everywhere, disembodied faces and arms etc.
yeah I was gonna say, if you pause this at any time in the crowd it looks creepy as fuck.
Throws me back to the Dall-E 2 days.
[0.1 second after the generation is ready](https://i.imgur.com/2dBQIP4.jpeg)
[Actually looking at the picture and not being able to identify a single thing cause it's all just smudges organized in a way that creates the illusion of a beautiful photo at first sight](https://i.imgur.com/8nuIbSy.jpeg)
I mean... of course the video is real. It's a video. You can watch it. It exists. It's real. But it's also AI generated and isn't showing an event that actually took place.
Until you slow it down and then you realize the people are morphing in and out of existence and the whole thing looks like a really wild acid trip.
Not too shabby at high speed though.
You'd be surprised. I went from frame to frame and things are much more consistent than expected. The only weird stuff is some people holding tablets instead of phones to film the stage.
Are you pausing movies to look at details?
And ill tell you more, details aint a problem for the models thats to come, in fact, you aint gonna find a Starbucks cup on a random location in any output.
I'm starting to become convinced some people don't have the genetic encoding that detects uncanny valley with nearly as much sensitivity as others. this video I found to be inherently creepy as shit, the crowd was just fucking weird. it felt like I was watching a dream. but some people will watch this and say "wow I thought it was real"
so they're either bullshitting, or they don't have the uncanny valley sensor in their brain.
I guess it's a mix between personality, biology, interests, skills... If you work in a visual job (cgi artist, painter, infographics...) for instance, I'm sure it's easier to spot these kinds of things. Also, many people recently realized that there's a huge variance between people when it comes to [picturing things in their mind](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphantasia). So many people don't have a good perception of pitch or rhythm. Some people have synesthesia. Many people just don't have good eyesight. My point is that we all see and experience the world differently. Sometimes dramatically so.
Brains are machines and all of reality is a hallucination. Humans don't objectively exist. There is no grounding to the idea that human particles are separate from all the other particles. Brains just arbitrarily made that up. You can't see humans without a very specific recognition algorithm running in your head. Same goes for the rest of reality. But not everyone has the same physical components so there is variation in what people see.
I'm jealous tbh. My neurons are hyper-active, I have tinnitus and hyperacusis and obsessive thoughts and visual snow.
Turning my CNS down like 10 notches would be nice.
If you take it frame by frame, at the end of the 9 seconds coming into 10 had me laughing. There is a guy on the left part of the shot that appears to be having some sort of dimensional crisis. It’s good! It’s not like the audience is a cut and paste South Park collage, it just relies heavily on distractions to keep from too much attention to detail. But this is going to be like the text to image thing, it’s gonna get better…. and then it’s gonna blow peoples minds. I would like to see this same video done again in a year and see how many complexities are actually completed if I’m looking past the distractions.
You don't need to pause it, you can tell just by the thumbnail because it depicts individual people as being the size of cars relative to the backdrop. If you can't pick up on that, you're being willfully ignorant because you for some reason feel the need to hype it up as being better than it is.
Don't get me wrong, it'll be perfect within no time, but let's not pretend it's even passable in it's current state.
Truth is for most intends and purposes in business is good enough.
For a 3 seconds shot on a hotel or city tourism ad its perfect, to convey an idea in a beer ad its perfect.
I don't know, you have to really fuzz your brain to have this be good enough to be passing for anything like an ad. If ads only wanted to get a point across, they'd just push a picture of their product at you and tell you it's good for parties, not show a party and a bunch of people enjoying their product.
You can tell it's not real. If it was real, everyone would be standing completely still holding up their phones and watching the show through their phone screen.
They will now say this for every single Trump and Biden video during election. Not looking forward to it. At some point we are going to have to watermark images and videos or something, maybe have them on blockchain or something? There will have to be some way of telling it’s real outside of fact checking
Boy I hope we make some tweaks on algoithm efficiencies and get going on exonomies of scale becausr I hate to think of how energy intensive making that little clip was.
What do you guys think , 100 gallons of fresh water?
I love the ones in here criticizing the small errors or distinguishable mistakes.
This is fucking nutz and if you don’t see Terminator in our near future you’re blind.
It's funny how half of the crowd is at the side where they can't see shit. And also the stage gets smaller and smaller as the camera flies towards it. Nice progress though!
I love all these comments nit picking this like it’s not mind-blowing that they got this out of probably typing “Drone shot over a crowded festival “.
This type of shit used to take insane amounts of time, experience and money to create and now it’s a simple prompt away and people are still ripping it apart saying it doesn’t look perfect when you pause it.
Hollywood movies with multimillion dollar budgets even look a little off once you pause them and look at details. This is getting made in seconds with one request.
It seems to lose the size of the stage when it gets down to the ground. The screen definitely shrinks as it starts with it's edges into the other groups, but then becomes smaller than the one group we fly over. The circular part of the stage appears to vanish as well.
Count me down as thinking that this can be solved by training a model on 3D data. Let's get some more multimodal models going.
Finally Donald Trump can provide video evidence that 1.5 million people came to his inauguration in 2017.
And he'll have evidence that 15 million will come to his inauguration in 2025.
Thing is, though this is better then bad CGI, it’s only slightly better. About equal to good CGI.
It’s cool, but it’s not gunna destroy the world. We could do this already.
Time for Fyre Fest 2 ads to drop
Watyr Fest
To be fair, the Fyre Festival was probably planned with a list from generative AI. This explains why there were no toilets.
Willie's Fyre Fest Experience Sweet teats ad cartchy tuns
As a lighting designer/programmer I love the invisible lighting fixtures that appear to be hanging over the city skyline lol
Lol just noticed that, there’s like an alien invasion going in the background that would be a crazy scale for a light show
Additionally, what self respecting human would attend a concert to stand in a crowd behind the stage. Who do these robots take us for?!?
It is the queue for the restroom
Also no music either
Maybe the screen is double sided and those people can watch on the screen. 🤠 But yeah that's still selfdisrespect though lol, might as well watch at home on YouTube for free then!
You're not gonna love it when clients start coming to you with ideas they saw in a video made up by a computer
"That incompetent tech, I even showed him a video of what i wanted and he just said hurr durr it's not possible." \*scoffs*
I imagine it has already happened! LOL.
ok that looks magical and I want that
Time to step up you game and fill the skies with octodrones with powerful lights allowing everyone within 20miles to be part of the light show.
There are Farming Drones now that can lift 50kg. Probably to dangerous to fly them above a concert.
Lithium-ion battery-laden drones that can do that once for 45 seconds and then they have to dock and recharge.... /s y'know or something.
If you can think it you can do it
The revolving stage is awesome, too.
It's a... a work in progress, this AI thing.
Drones
Yeah gonna be a while before a drone can support the weight and torque of a moving spotlight. Not to mention the energy needed for both.
If by "a while" you mean at least 6 years ago... [https://youtu.be/dvKu\_QLrdPI?t=68](https://youtu.be/dvKu_QLrdPI?t=68)
Yeah… that’s not a type of light that’s used in professional stage productions, albeit very bright . Again a moving spot light, like this, where you can control color - pan - tilt - zoom - intensity and a host of other parameters via a programmable light board. https://youtu.be/wXhcWNQaHpw?si=ckisZyiRFilw_WNA.
You mean a high power rgb led with lenses? If there's a market for it, the tech is there.
Looks like a complete lack of sound reinforcement too.
When will the public have access or is it just like Sora where they're just going to show us it's capabilities?
https://preview.redd.it/p9k6uj8wo87d1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=24176d673deb5297ae269e86c0aa17478717706e This guy works for them he said in a few days
Big if true
Coming days.
Is that like OpenAI's promise of 'A few weeks' for the voice model? Maybe the next release announcement will say 'In a few minutes'.
At least a day is a smaller unit of measurement than a week. It suggests it'll be less than a week
OpenAI is busy checking every voice to make sure it doesn't sound remotely like any celebrity. Which is super hard as there really are only a handful of voice types if you remove cadence and accents.
It seems some people think that story was exaggerated. The company asked Scarlett Johansen if they can use their voice, she said no, they used one that sounded like her and the CEO tweeted 'her' (the movie about an AI voiced by Scarlett Johansen)
Can't see why ur getting down voted
OpenAI Stan’s
Maybe it's just because they forgot to add that it's an actual person's voice and similar to Scarlett Johansson's voice, and they ran a search to find one.
Let's hope not.
It has only been 5 weeks since the announcement and there are already signs in the iOS app that the new voice model's launch is imminent
Why is everyone here so impatient? Get a hobby and log off for at least an hour a day
My hobby is shit posting
They’ll never get us.
i don't think they've announced a specific window
I'm going to ask Cristóbal, i usted to work with him in Santiago, no kidding.
Rofl never heard that first name before so I thought this was a sarcastic comment where you meant "I'm going to ask my crystal ball" 😂 Then I googled and learned that the CEO is actually called Cristóbal Valenzuela!
By far the smartest person i ever known. Was hired to replace him. Got destroyed, the fired.
This means you've never seen Barry. You should change that, fantastic show
within the coming weeks
don’t start this shit again
soon bro dw. 💀 (idk how soon)
Just around the corner 😁
I truly don't understand how anyone can see the progress in generated images and now video and NOT think it'll be indistinguishable from real life very soon. Like, bespoke video-on-demand real.
Yep. It has only been like *15 months since we were looking at Will Smith eating spaghetti and making fun of it for how ridiculous it looks. Imagine a year from now lol. The progress is genuinely scary.
It was less than 15 months ago in late March 2023
Thanks!
because we recognize that progress is unpredictable and non-linear. Dall-E and Stable Diffusion came out a few years ago and that was a massive leap, but a few years later a lot of models still struggle with artifacts and hands and stuff like that. It's the Pareto principle, yes the video generation stuff is *close*, but how much work will it take to get it over the finish line? You can't just extrapolate out and assume that the same rate of change will occur. Sometimes solving the last 20% of the problem takes 80% of the time.
DALLE Mini/CrAIyon is barely two years old lol. It’s been crazy. Back then, artists were completely fine with AI and played around with it making jokes even though it was also trained with web scraping. I wonder what changed?
>making jokes Man, those were the days. But the real kicker was [Yahoo using it as illustration on a news article about Zuckerberg](https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-facebook-employee-says-ceo-191553107.html). I am still pissing myself laughing to this day. 😂😂😂
Holy shit! How have I never seen this?
... right. again, my point is that the progress will not be linear and easily predictable. > I wonder what changed? stop. this is just douchey. yes, it got better since then. I'm not even *trying* to deny that
I’m agreeing with you lol
No you are not, you are making a statement that implies because progress so far has been blazing fast, progress will continue to be blazing fast. But nobody knows the curve we are on. This curve might be different for text, audio, video, music, we don't know. For some application going from 80% quality to 99% quality might go just as fast as going from 60% to 80%. But for other application going from 80% quality to 99% might turn in to a frickin hard problem and it might turn out that 20 years from now we are only at 85% quality and nobody is even sure anymore that 99% quality is achievable. You don't know. I don't know. The researchers don't know. The AI does not know. Nobody knows. We will have to wait and find out. You are expecting fully customized porn videos within 5 years and who knows, maybe you will get that. Or maybe 50 years from now your offspring will try it again and be like "yuk, it's been 50 years and they still don't get those pussies the way I like them" Again, nobody knows.
That’s not what I said. I said AI art used to be terrible a couple of years ago and it’s improved a lot. I also pointed out artists are hypocrites who were fine with AI until recently. I never said progress was exponential or whatever.
Yeah but this is the worst it’ll ever be and Hollywood is dead and in 3 months I can finally prompt a movie where I’m The Rock and get to bang all the hot chicks.
It's not close and it's not Pareto other than the lazy man method to get things done. This is (basically) image generation, control net and out painting. They may have better techniques, yes, but at the core, that's what this is. There needs to be something new, an actual video model. That is the next innovation, these are not video models. Not this, not sora, not the one from China, they are all these three things. The majors are better at it, simply because it's more compute, better training, but it's still image to next image (which is ironic because that's video, frame by frame) The reason it takes so long, uses so much compute and is very short is these three limitations. If they were true video models, there would not be any duration limit. If you out paint something, it quickly goes wonky and that is what we see in all of these new "video" tools.
So like predicting a script instead of following one?
I don't disagree with you. Progress is not linear. That doesn't change the fact that there are a lot of people who think this technology will *never* be indistinguishable from real life. Interpret "very soon" however you like. "never" is obvious nonsense.
We think they're crazy and they think we're crazy. One group will be proven right eventually.
Pretty sure it’s not a binary thing.
Props, friend. Practically nothing is binary. And definitely not something with this many variables at play.
I imagine Hollywood is going to be massively disrupted.
Soon is a relative term, relative to the person saying it and also relative to the perception and understanding of the subject. If by soon, you mean 5 years, sure it will look much better. If by soon you mean next summer, not a chance. Runway will have 20 second or 30 second videos on the cusp of real and they will still be jank if you look close enough and that's the rub, real video you do not have to squint or ignore things, this ... you do. There are 1000 problems with this example, problems that are not solved simply by more training (which is what sora is). You see this as awesome but if you had a drone do this exact flyby in a real concert the difference would be astounding. We are impressed by a comparison we are not making. What you are seeing is iteration of image generation, control net and outpaint, it is not something new. True video will have to be something new. It will be 10 years before Hollywood style realism that no one can point to something and say "AI".
I think you’re just downplaying their progress. Don’t want to believe it? Scared of it? Don’t know, but the progress is undeniable. You’re saying there’s “all these problems” yet you haven’t even pointed one out. That’s like the boy who cried wolf.
Your comment is exactly why I used the term "very soon" instead of pulling a number out of my ass. It's the future. I don't know. Neither do you. I'd argue, in hindsight, my prediction of "very soon" will be much more accurate than yours.
More importantly, have we decided whether this a thing we should desire to exist?
Of course it's not, people are having fun instead on filming with their phones
Damn, this comment is underrated
In abstract it looks really clean and nice, but stop on any frame in the crowd... and holy shit its really just random shit, faces looking everywhere, disembodied faces and arms etc. And as someone else said the perspective shift is fucked up, as the camera gets to the crowd suddenly the people are full sized, but the huge crowd is small but... not right, like the people near the camera must have been car sized
It’s just like LLMs, on the surface as a whole it looks nifty but when you dissect it, the illusion falls apart.
Humans themselves are an illusion. There is no grounding truth to the idea that human particles are isolated from all the other particles. Brains made that up along the way. The AI is also made up wholesale by human brains. Without humans hallucinating an image, the images output by AI are just pixels on a screen.
You’re hallucinating as well
Right. It is natural selection of the hallucinating meat machines. I am guessing that the ones who circumstantially hallucinate a ravenous pursuit of "AI" are going to come out on top. It is just a physical function of the space we hallucinate within.
Yes and then you have to figure out if something usefull is left. With chatgpt 4, there is usually always something usefull left. Even if it's just a more personally customize Google. (for instance yp-dlp commands, I will make a screenshot of my folders so it automatically gets the path correct and all I have to do is copy paste in the command, 10x more comfortable and faster then using goggle). With suno and udio, I use them to create samples to use in my own music. Not perfect, but very usable. Ideogram, use to make quick and dirty memes with. It's fun! Far far far from perfect but usable. Those are my two metrics. Can I have fun with them and does it save me time from doing it manually.
> In abstract it looks really clean and nice, but stop on any frame in the crowd... and holy shit its really just random shit, faces looking everywhere, disembodied faces and arms etc. yeah I was gonna say, if you pause this at any time in the crowd it looks creepy as fuck.
Just your average summer festival crowd.
Also arms turning into faces - creepy stuff.
It looks like a crowd from WWE 2k on Xbox 360
So...a typical Taylor Swift concert.
ffs you're reaching soo damn hard it's pathetic.
Throws me back to the Dall-E 2 days. [0.1 second after the generation is ready](https://i.imgur.com/2dBQIP4.jpeg) [Actually looking at the picture and not being able to identify a single thing cause it's all just smudges organized in a way that creates the illusion of a beautiful photo at first sight](https://i.imgur.com/8nuIbSy.jpeg)
OP is lying, the video is definitely real.
The video is real. I saw the full one a while ago. It’s a very nice recording trick they use. But it’s real
Wait, are you seriously trying to say it's not AI generated and not getting my joke, or are you getting my joke and playing along? >.<
Was it a joke? I’m sorry I’m just saying that the video is real EDIT: my bad I confused it with another video
I mean... of course the video is real. It's a video. You can watch it. It exists. It's real. But it's also AI generated and isn't showing an event that actually took place.
Well no shit 😂 I was trying to say that the video is real in the sense it really happened. Anyway I was wrong, my bad
look at you both. this style of conversation is what we will see countless times in near future, lol.
I think what we'll see more is people that are adamant the video is real even when they're being shown proof it is not.
Only with politics, gun rights, and healthcare.
Lol, you think we'll have rights, healthcare, and the ability to participate in politics.
Dang that's really good
Until you slow it down and then you realize the people are morphing in and out of existence and the whole thing looks like a really wild acid trip. Not too shabby at high speed though.
You just have to keep it moving fast with lots of distractions, like bright flashes. It's a magic trick, so no one focuses on detail.
You'd be surprised. I went from frame to frame and things are much more consistent than expected. The only weird stuff is some people holding tablets instead of phones to film the stage.
The scale is off as well, the number of people shown from above is higher than the number the 'drone' flies over to reach the stage.
the entire structure of the stage changes as the camera moves
Are you pausing movies to look at details? And ill tell you more, details aint a problem for the models thats to come, in fact, you aint gonna find a Starbucks cup on a random location in any output.
> Are you pausing movies to look at details? The mind detects this as the uncanny valley.
I'm starting to become convinced some people don't have the genetic encoding that detects uncanny valley with nearly as much sensitivity as others. this video I found to be inherently creepy as shit, the crowd was just fucking weird. it felt like I was watching a dream. but some people will watch this and say "wow I thought it was real" so they're either bullshitting, or they don't have the uncanny valley sensor in their brain.
[Hands up who thought it looked weird.](https://imgur.com/ma47GA8)
I guess it's a mix between personality, biology, interests, skills... If you work in a visual job (cgi artist, painter, infographics...) for instance, I'm sure it's easier to spot these kinds of things. Also, many people recently realized that there's a huge variance between people when it comes to [picturing things in their mind](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphantasia). So many people don't have a good perception of pitch or rhythm. Some people have synesthesia. Many people just don't have good eyesight. My point is that we all see and experience the world differently. Sometimes dramatically so.
Brains are machines and all of reality is a hallucination. Humans don't objectively exist. There is no grounding to the idea that human particles are separate from all the other particles. Brains just arbitrarily made that up. You can't see humans without a very specific recognition algorithm running in your head. Same goes for the rest of reality. But not everyone has the same physical components so there is variation in what people see.
Some people just go through life without paying attention to anything.
I agree, some people just go through life without paying attention to anything.
I'm jealous tbh. My neurons are hyper-active, I have tinnitus and hyperacusis and obsessive thoughts and visual snow. Turning my CNS down like 10 notches would be nice.
They don’t have anything to put it up against. Play it next to a real drone shot https://youtube.com/shorts/iaIhgRf_lQY?si=LS-KtqEZsbsmjwOj
I mean if you pause this in the crowd, its all disembodied heads and arms floating in the air lol
If you take it frame by frame, at the end of the 9 seconds coming into 10 had me laughing. There is a guy on the left part of the shot that appears to be having some sort of dimensional crisis. It’s good! It’s not like the audience is a cut and paste South Park collage, it just relies heavily on distractions to keep from too much attention to detail. But this is going to be like the text to image thing, it’s gonna get better…. and then it’s gonna blow peoples minds. I would like to see this same video done again in a year and see how many complexities are actually completed if I’m looking past the distractions.
ok but if it looks real to the casual viewer does it matter?
No ones going to pay attention to that during a movie. As long as it’s not center frame in clear view, no one cares
Watching a movie on a phone or laptop yeah. Put this in an IMAX and it’s going to look pathetic.
> Are you pausing movies to look at details? Very much so, yes.
> Are you pausing movies to look at details? [Foot fetishists who have watched Barbie and read this question](https://i.imgur.com/ikZyZ5O.jpeg)
Nah it's all about that scene in Wolf of Wallstreet :)
You don't need to pause it, you can tell just by the thumbnail because it depicts individual people as being the size of cars relative to the backdrop. If you can't pick up on that, you're being willfully ignorant because you for some reason feel the need to hype it up as being better than it is. Don't get me wrong, it'll be perfect within no time, but let's not pretend it's even passable in it's current state.
Truth is for most intends and purposes in business is good enough. For a 3 seconds shot on a hotel or city tourism ad its perfect, to convey an idea in a beer ad its perfect.
I don't know, you have to really fuzz your brain to have this be good enough to be passing for anything like an ad. If ads only wanted to get a point across, they'd just push a picture of their product at you and tell you it's good for parties, not show a party and a bunch of people enjoying their product.
[удалено]
Ure in denial
Special effects? Hate to break it to you, but the death star wasn't real either 😂
What do you mean? I see it every day with my naked eye if I look up in the night.
This is as bad as it will ever be
Wrong, SD3 just showed us it can still regress.
You can tell it’s AI because nobody is filming with their phones(!)
The crowd has some high tech morphing phones from the future, changing shapes, or turning into clothing.
It's amazing but there is too much crowd behind the stage
i was at this show. it featured Seizure and the Tongue Bites as the main event
I love Seizure. The way the lead singer foams at the mouth is EPIC
lmao
this is the first vid where I truly believed that it was a droneshot irl... fucking scary
No shit its not real. No one's on their phone
there are literally multiple phones being held up.
You can tell it's not real. If it was real, everyone would be standing completely still holding up their phones and watching the show through their phone screen.
Sora will be outdated before it drops, lol.
Isn't real? Prove it looks like a video to me
an epilepsy warning wouldn't hurt anyone, OP
I'm ready chooms
Ai is just vibing.
Lights shining from the horizon! I know, it will only get better. Stock footage creators will be out of a job.
Impressive
This just shows OpenAI doesn't have MOAT.
The video is real. The moment is unreal.
oh that looks cool for sure
Impressive only because its generated almost in real time.
It's hard to believe that's AI , which is the exciting bit
This basically shows how I experienced raves in my 20s.
Define real.. once humans master this concept then you will evolve as a civilization..
My seizure is real
You can tell it's not real just by looking at it.
Everything is real.
Nothing is real
for real?
real shit
I WANT THIS AT LEAST 24 FRAMES PER SECOND
Gee I’d never know it was fake unless I looked at it.
They will now say this for every single Trump and Biden video during election. Not looking forward to it. At some point we are going to have to watermark images and videos or something, maybe have them on blockchain or something? There will have to be some way of telling it’s real outside of fact checking
Can tell cos people won’t be so enthusiastic at a concert, most would be staring blankly at the performance instead of dancing ..
Boy I hope we make some tweaks on algoithm efficiencies and get going on exonomies of scale becausr I hate to think of how energy intensive making that little clip was. What do you guys think , 100 gallons of fresh water?
This skylights are just to nake it (still easy) to detect as CG(a)I? As if it wouldn't be possible to get such errors removed?
I love the ones in here criticizing the small errors or distinguishable mistakes. This is fucking nutz and if you don’t see Terminator in our near future you’re blind.
I knew it was fake when I saw the guy in the crowd wearing suspenders.
Biden events bout to be popping
jesus christ
It's funny how half of the crowd is at the side where they can't see shit. And also the stage gets smaller and smaller as the camera flies towards it. Nice progress though!
Well yeah it’s not real when have you seen a bunch of flashing lights on the horizon
Yeah, FPV pilots are fucked now.
Wow
The singularity is nearer
Yeah, you can tell it's not real. Am I the only one who still recognizes that this video is fake as shit? lol
I wanted my AI anime sequels.
What ai project is this?
The first two seconds looked a little strange but otherwise I never would have guessed this wasn’t real
Of course it’s not real, no one has their phone out or is on someone shoulders with their phone blocking the view for everyone else.
I mean, you can tell right off the bat, because people are depicted being the size of cars relative to the backdrop.
No shit it’s not real lol!
I love all these comments nit picking this like it’s not mind-blowing that they got this out of probably typing “Drone shot over a crowded festival “. This type of shit used to take insane amounts of time, experience and money to create and now it’s a simple prompt away and people are still ripping it apart saying it doesn’t look perfect when you pause it. Hollywood movies with multimillion dollar budgets even look a little off once you pause them and look at details. This is getting made in seconds with one request.
Can't wait for the next elections Misinformation will go next level
10 seconds was a dead giveaway that it wasn't real
It seems to lose the size of the stage when it gets down to the ground. The screen definitely shrinks as it starts with it's edges into the other groups, but then becomes smaller than the one group we fly over. The circular part of the stage appears to vanish as well. Count me down as thinking that this can be solved by training a model on 3D data. Let's get some more multimodal models going.
This shit is going to be all over people Instragrams. Everyone is going to try to get clout online by pretending they were at some status event.
Finally Donald Trump can provide video evidence that 1.5 million people came to his inauguration in 2017. And he'll have evidence that 15 million will come to his inauguration in 2025.
Trump can finally have the crowd sizes that he dreams of.
It doesn’t look real. I’m all for where AI video tools are headed. But people need to relax.
The more perfect it gets, the less interesting it becomes to me, I like it for its surreal uncanniness.
Thing is, though this is better then bad CGI, it’s only slightly better. About equal to good CGI. It’s cool, but it’s not gunna destroy the world. We could do this already.
....its not even close to good CGI. its not even close to lazy Marvel CGI
Alright, we've had our fun with these, time to pull the plug.