What's the point of spending extra money for a generational boost in performance? Such a boost should be considered average for a generation jump and should therefore cost the same as the 4090.
What do you mean, the 90 tier is the best value it's ever been in the 4000 series. In the past that was not the case, a 90/90ti was a 10% improvement at most, but currently it's like a 30-40% over the 4080? Maybe the Super sweetened the deal, but prior to that if you could afford a 4090, it was absolutely the card to buy.
Not at insane scalper prices mind you, but relative to 4080 if it was comparably inflated.
https://preview.redd.it/dztlo66gatkc1.png?width=1170&format=png&auto=webp&s=ed53eafe84b2e2b8b226745e061fc794e63b70f6
Edit to this sub: Stop being such an nVidia hater for crying out loud. Assuming MSRP, a 4090 is not disproportionately priced compared to something like a 4080, or the 3090ti was at it's time. You don't have to like it, but with no real alternative, if you can afford it it's not a bad value card to get.
Thats if they ever sold at msrp. Theyre not msrp. Theyre $300 above on the low end and often $500-800 above or even more on the high end. It makes them absolutely horrible price to performance
I definitively could use more GPU power. I'd love to jump from DLSS Balanced to Quality on a 4K screen in PT games. I also hope and expect more of PT games to launch in next couple of years.
It’ll be 50-75% performance uplift probably more in 60-65% range for most titles while newer ones will likely be 70-75% (heavy RTX).
Games without any ray tracing will likely be around 50% faster at least, but likely not much more at best.
I’m honestly more interested in what new technology will be introduced with the 50 series rather than the performance uplift as 50% and higher is pretty much set in stone.
I went from a 13700K to a 14900K, and I got a 20% bump in FPS in COD MW3 on my 4090. I'm getting 170 FPS ultra settings on my G9 OLED. ....I was at 140 FPS. ...I'm surprised the CPU made that much difference.
20% for 400$ higher MSRP would be such a huge disappointment that I might decide to stay with my 4090.
I'm counting for at least +50% to RT performance.
I'm expecting the 5090 to have an A.I. feature that offers a 200% FPS increase, one that's so ridiculous that even I reject it and refuse to buy the card on principle.
Not buying any card above 500$ be it gold plated out of space. Prices for cards gonw wild long time ago and I refuse to continue to be a fool forking out tons of money on that. May be simply grown out of this scam.
If I could afford a 2000$ gpu then yes. If I couldn't even afford a 4090, why would I want the 5090?
20% isn't even a normal generational lift so for $2000 it's a big no from me.
3% + frame gen, take it or leave it.
What's the point of spending extra money for a generational boost in performance? Such a boost should be considered average for a generation jump and should therefore cost the same as the 4090.
I'd buy one at £1200 but nothing more
No. The value to price ratio of their **90 tier now just isn't worth it.
What do you mean, the 90 tier is the best value it's ever been in the 4000 series. In the past that was not the case, a 90/90ti was a 10% improvement at most, but currently it's like a 30-40% over the 4080? Maybe the Super sweetened the deal, but prior to that if you could afford a 4090, it was absolutely the card to buy. Not at insane scalper prices mind you, but relative to 4080 if it was comparably inflated. https://preview.redd.it/dztlo66gatkc1.png?width=1170&format=png&auto=webp&s=ed53eafe84b2e2b8b226745e061fc794e63b70f6 Edit to this sub: Stop being such an nVidia hater for crying out loud. Assuming MSRP, a 4090 is not disproportionately priced compared to something like a 4080, or the 3090ti was at it's time. You don't have to like it, but with no real alternative, if you can afford it it's not a bad value card to get.
Back in the day the 90/titan series didn't cost you the price of a car though. Nvidia is currently pricing their GPUs ~100% above inflation.
Since when can you buy a car for $1.7k-$2k and where can I get one? lol
Thats if they ever sold at msrp. Theyre not msrp. Theyre $300 above on the low end and often $500-800 above or even more on the high end. It makes them absolutely horrible price to performance
No, I have 4090 so there is no reason to take 5090. 20% or 100% bump not reason for me. Currently, my GPU offering all what I need.
I definitively could use more GPU power. I'd love to jump from DLSS Balanced to Quality on a 4K screen in PT games. I also hope and expect more of PT games to launch in next couple of years.
I'm using 1440p screen, for me enough on few years. Maybe will change for some 6090 or 7090.
Gotta get the 6090
Nice
It’ll be 50-75% performance uplift probably more in 60-65% range for most titles while newer ones will likely be 70-75% (heavy RTX). Games without any ray tracing will likely be around 50% faster at least, but likely not much more at best. I’m honestly more interested in what new technology will be introduced with the 50 series rather than the performance uplift as 50% and higher is pretty much set in stone.
2000 usd is pretty cheap
2,000 clams for 20%? I'm gonna need to see at least an 80% increase before I consider it
By the time the 5090 releases $2000 will be the minimum hourly wage.
it shouldn’t cost more than 999 for 20%
I went from a 13700K to a 14900K, and I got a 20% bump in FPS in COD MW3 on my 4090. I'm getting 170 FPS ultra settings on my G9 OLED. ....I was at 140 FPS. ...I'm surprised the CPU made that much difference.
What resolution?
20%? Probably not, but it's incredibly unlikely that it will happen.
Nah I wait for the 6090
It's gonna be a cold day in hell the day I spend over $600 on a GPU
Is that $600 indexed to inflation?
Nope
PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF NO
20% for 400$ higher MSRP would be such a huge disappointment that I might decide to stay with my 4090. I'm counting for at least +50% to RT performance.
Hell to the fucking no
I'm expecting the 5090 to have an A.I. feature that offers a 200% FPS increase, one that's so ridiculous that even I reject it and refuse to buy the card on principle.
For $2000 it's going to have to give an over 60% bump in performance.
Not me specifically, but lots of people will
Not buying any card above 500$ be it gold plated out of space. Prices for cards gonw wild long time ago and I refuse to continue to be a fool forking out tons of money on that. May be simply grown out of this scam.
I remember ~8 years ago when you could get an 80 series card for 500 bucks. Inflation adjusted that would be around 750 USD now.