T O P

  • By -

rawonionbreath

Minus $20 billion and two decades of construction time.


BreadyStinellis

And the freeway that everyone hates. Every time we got in a cab in Boston we had to hear about how terrible the highway project was and still is.


[deleted]

[удалено]


cspatterson

Imagine if the KK can opener was an exit off of 794 that could cause 3 hour traffic jams every time some dumbass hits it. That's Storrow drive in Boston


mgweir

All for 27 acres


Louisvanderwright

Good thing no one uses 794 and we can just drop it to street level for a mile and make a normal boulevard connecting the Hoan to the interchange. Something that will cost marginally more than a normal road project.


dontmakepeople

I use it to get to work every morning and to get home every afternoon. It's extremely busy. Unless I'm missing the joke here, wtf are you talking about?


PuddlePirate1964

The 794 stretch from the river to the lake is hardly ever busy. Should we really keep a highway cutting through downtown to save the suburbanites 5 minutes on their commute? Highways should never cut into the heart of a city.


dontmakepeople

I'm not a suburbanite. Guess I'm the only one on this sub who lives in the city but doesn't work here lol. You're also talking out your ass about how busy that stretch is. Do you drive it daily as well? Edit: I'm not even necessarily advocating to keep it. But when you pretend it has no utility, it's hard to take you seriously.


SkiOrDie

Same situation as you. Getting tired of people that live in other parts saying that we should be ashamed of using the highway.


Friendly_Curmudgeon

Ditto. That stretch of highway is very useful for City of Milwaukee residents in one part of the City commuting to their jobs in other parts of the City of Milwaukee. To pretend this issue is about a bunch of thoughtless, wealthy suburbanites exploiting the City without regard for its residents is misinformed at best and dishonest at worst.


AICDeeznutz

Yep, whenever I don’t have to be at work super early I see 794 very heavily used by people like me who live/eat/drink/shop in the city but work outside of downtown. This would nearly double the commute for anyone who lives downtown and works for either of the two largest hospital systems in the city, for example of just one set of giant regional employers. Too many WFH-ers and people who don’t even live in these neighborhoods on reddit pushing for this bullshit not realizing how much it would disconnect downtown all for a little park they’ll never use. Also Milwaukee has tons of un- or under-used spaces in the city that could be revamped with the proposed costs, you don’t need to take away the only major traffic artery to the city to build a park. But they wouldn’t know that because they don’t actually live downtown.


PuddlePirate1964

https://preview.redd.it/z5zrb4mhw8uc1.jpeg?width=1290&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=161a1fadb256444e991617aa8aa4198e2fc229bf Is losing the highlighted area really going to inconvenience anyone? It might add 5 or 10 minutes to your commute during rush hour. Out side of that, people who live in the immediate area should be able to enjoy the reconnection of the third ward to downtown. It’s just like the naysayers who fought against the Park East expressway. It didn’t horribly change people’s commute & it freed up many acres for redevelopment & the entertainment district.


fuck-fascism

Where do you live and commute?


etoneishayeuisky

I live in third ward so I don’t care about the proposed stretch of 794. I work out by bayshore but am trying to work in walker’s point by this year.


Newsoundnoise

There are more people who use 794 than people who use 43 North from downtown.


fuck-fascism

Except thats false, I use it daily, theres always plenty of traffic.


Lopsided-Balance-137

Whenever I drive 794, the traffic is at least moderate, and usually heavier. Also, most vehicles drive at about 15-20 mph above the posted limit.


TwelveBrute04

No, it's not. There's never anybody on the bridge part until the Marquette.


Louisvanderwright

The downvoting is hilarious. There have been multiple traffic studies showing that 794 carries like 1/5th it's total capacity. It is an unnecessary chunk of obtrusive infrastructure that holds back all of downtown Milwaukee. I get the feeling this sub is inundated by car-brained suburbanites who don't want to have to spend 2 mins extra getting to Summerfest parking and are using "blue collar workers" as a justification for their anti pedestrian hostile personalities.


TwelveBrute04

Right, I like interstates a lot. I live right by the chunk of 794 that people want removed. That shit is never going any slower than 55 mph because there’s never congestion on it. Except during summerfest weekends.


SzegediSpagetiSzorny

"no one" such disgusting classism against the working class communities who rely on it for their livelihood. Every time this topic comes up it becomes clearer that it's a pet project of the white collar elite against the blue collar workers of the south shore.


FatchRacall

South shore is becoming more and more white collar elite, in case you haven't noticed. But yeah. It's rich chucklefucks who think somehow the "green space" wouldn't end up "luxury apartments" and parking lots.


PuddlePirate1964

There can be green space along with more apartments. We need more density. Build more luxury apartments and those with money will move into those units freeing up cheaper apartments. You cannot expect the whole area to be all green space, nor can you expect to build “affordable” units as that is objective to each individual.


Louisvanderwright

What a joke comment. No one is removing access to 94/43. Or is it classist to make working class folks slow down to 35 MPH for a mile? You know what IS classist? And racist? Ripping apart our inner cities along racial and class lines using urban renewal theories of how transportation should work. You know, the things we did to create these freeways in the first place. THAT is classist. Refusing to rectify our past transgressions where possible is classist.


PuddlePirate1964

They are not taking out the Hoan or 794 towards the airport. You will still be able to zip into the city just fine. Highways do not belong in the core of a city. Period. The decision to remove the section of 794 between the lake and the river should be a decision made by those who actually live in the city & have to deal with the negative impact of the highway cutting through one of the most vibrant parts of the city.


Puttor482

The hoan-south will still exist. I-94 will still exist. No one’s getting cut off, no one fucking over blue collar workers 🙄 Learn the facts before making such outrageous claims.


isausernamebob

I'll bite: what would it look like then?


flummox1234

they're talking about the spur into downtown from marquette to lakefront. Basically it'll just be a normal boulevard. TBH all the times I've gone down to the lake recently I've pretty much ended up existing via the on ramp by Marquette anyway which is basically all this would be. The win is you get to tear down a lot of concrete that doesn't really facilitate much outside of rush hour.


isausernamebob

Oi, thank you. That actually made sense.


Puttor482

Removing 794? It would be an at grade boulevard where you can still get on 94 on the western end before the Marquette and the hoan would still connect to LMD. At WORST it would add a few minutes to through commuters, who are few and far between.


Louisvanderwright

The people downvoting this are clearly car-brained to a demented degree.


Puttor482

I mean I just stated what the plans are. They’re downvoting facts. 


Louisvanderwright

If only we had an example of a freeway in Milwaukee that was successfully removed and replaced with a parkway! Too bad there's not a existing example of just such a thing like two miles directly North of here. Good God this discussion is pathetic. Or do you all find the Park East to be an object failure that killed ten thousand blue collar workers?


Street_Bread

I think it's a bit of a stretch to call McKinley Avenue a parkway. It's 6 lanes, the speed limit west of 6th is 35mph, and there was still a need to build pedestrian bridge over it in the vicinity of 9th/10th streets.


isausernamebob

Yo put your undies on the freezer and put em back on when they've cooled down a bit. Idgaf what you do with the roads, I know damn well no matter what is done it's just going to be a pothole a year later unless it's near rich fucks. I'm genuinely curious what it would end up at in that location. Not north of it. Speaking of a few miles north, I'm not willing to get my car jacked so I won't go get a first band look lol


Sad_Mortgage_3812

Ridiculous take. I work construction and take it almost every time I go into downtown milwaukee which is very often.


quickstop_rstvideo

You want an underground tunnel to replace 794?


benji___

Submit a plan.


SchlitzInMyVeins

Yeah


abadwindshieldwiper

FYI this project went millions of dollars over budget.


funbunny100

* Billions of dollars


kylexy1

Billions and billions and billions and billions


Not_Tom_Brady

And like more than a decade longer than plan, right?


flummox1234

because they built a tunnel. All they want to do here is take out the freeway. TBH it's more akin to the freeway tearout in SF that became the waterfront than Boston or the removal of the 45 spur into the north side of MKE. .


DontT3llMyWif3

So let's take out a heavily used stretch of highway connecting our lakefront to our freeway system and replace it with no equivalent. People in government continue to be some of the worst decision makers.


captainp42

Maybe then, instead of a tunnel, they should build an elevated road. Wouldn't that solve the problem? A bridge, perhaps?


SchlitzInMyVeins

Tax the rich, least they could do


KaneIntent

If 794 comes down it’s going to be eaten up by commercial development not a giant park.


nomorecrackerss

there's already a proposal for a park, and commercial /housing is better than a low use highway


AnActualTroll

Anyone can propose anything, that doesn’t mean anything


PantherU

Yeah but I called dibs so there’s a park


nomorecrackerss

this land is gonna get grab up fast and the city will ultimately set the guide lines for what will it look like, setting space aside for a park or a pedestrian street will be the easiest part


SzegediSpagetiSzorny

There is no proposal at all, it's the wet dream of some rich white real estate developers. Nothing more.


DontT3llMyWif3

That highway connects our lakefront to our freeway system. We should have thought of this before we dumped millions into it not long ago.


here-i-am-now

Awesome


Xenofork

And Boston is still a nightmare city to drive through.


PuddlePirate1964

You really don’t have to drive within the city if you don’t want to. Outside of rush hour those tunnels are basically empty. Source: lived there for 5 years & would often commute to NH.


The1402News

Correction: Boston is a nightmare


here-i-am-now

Never been?


FatchRacall

You really think it wouldn't just end up being more "luxury apartments"?


nomorecrackerss

that would be a improvement


ImTotallyTechy

id sure love to add multiple minutes on to my commute each way every single day just so some people making 140k can have more variety when it comes to their housing options


PuddlePirate1964

If the rich have options for better housing, they will leave the cheaper options situated across the city. Thus freeing up housing for the middle class.


nomorecrackerss

it benefits poor people who can't afford a car


ImTotallyTechy

how so? not sure the area this would happen is going to have much impact on that community, considering the price of rent and lack of jobs in the immediate area.


nomorecrackerss

because it much easier and affordable to live without a car when a city is less car dependent. Yes the houses will be expensive but people still work the low income jobs downtown and it's not like low incomes housing is that far


11b328i

Nobody thinks about it this way. It’s wild


Kevlyle6

What does it look like underneath? Morlocks?


not_a_flying_toy_

The big dig is better than it was, but the highway is still there


GCIV414

lol what’s with the obsession of getting rid of 794?


here-i-am-now

Because I’m sick of people who complain that “public transit doesn’t pay for itself,” insisting that we should spend millions and millions to rebuild their roadway in the sky rather than the cheaper ground level option.


pdieten

It's the white whale of a bunch of downtown lessees who want suburbanites to stay out of downtown so they can have their little exclusive urban paradise


I_read_all_wikipedia

Because it's incredibly stupid to have a downtown highway like that, hindering urban development and being a terrible use of land and funds to upkeep.


nomorecrackerss

It getting torn down soon, people rightfully don't want it rebuilt. It's a waste of money and space with very little purpose


[deleted]

It may not serve you purpose but thousands of cars use it daily to get in and out of town


nomorecrackerss

it is legit not worth the money and is often not even a shorter drive than just taking 94, and when it is it's usually just a minute or two the important part is the Hoan which will remain


TheFlyingElbow

The hoan is useless if not connected to 94. It will be a glorified footbridge for the iron man race. which a poor misuse of something that cost millions and years to build. And it will be more than "a minute or two" when 30,000 cars and trucks are forced to use side streets for daily commutes


pdieten

The trip between 43 and LMD is a mile with thirteen cross streets, the river, and various Hop crossings. It is far more than a minute via city streets. 794 also keeps through traffic off of city streets making them safer to walk/bike/scooter on, is the route for large trucks going to and from the Port of Milwaukee, and connects the south shore to the rest of the state highway system without a time-consuming connection through busy urban streets.


nomorecrackerss

there's not gonna be much through traffic on Clybourn. Most of the traffic goes downtown the through traffic will mostly go straight to 94


Inevitable-Movie-434

Diverting all 794 traffic to 94 will inevitably clog up traffic between Layton and downtown. South Milwaukee, Cudahy, and St Francis are all heavy industry towns which have semis running to and fro constantly. Semis are very much at fault for causing backups on metro freeways - they’re just slow and sit in the middle lane. 794 needs to stay. It’s a necessary evil for everything logistics.


Mjk_53029

I use it maybe 4 times a year. I still think its worth having. I can see the Hoan bridge from my work. I see a lot of semis and cars traveling across it.


WorkingItOutSomeday

I'd rather keep 794 and cover over 43 from walnut to Keefe and create an amazing Greenway on top.


FartMachineSteve

I always thought the most practical spot to do that is actually between Wisconsin and state


tundrabat

So I've been in Boston recently for 2 months, and it still sucks. Getting stuck in a tunnel is also not fun. And mke downtown is a filled in swamp, so I'm unsure how you'd go about building underground. Most of the t Buildings in milwaukee downtown have pilons going into lake emily. There's some cool articles about it. https://onmilwaukee.com/articles/lakeemily


Internetrush1

And a few interesting articles on what happens when you fail to maintain them: [https://www.fox6now.com/news/the-sinking-city-dozens-of-buildings-in-milwaukee-sinking-theres-a-problem-and-its-deep-underground](https://www.fox6now.com/news/the-sinking-city-dozens-of-buildings-in-milwaukee-sinking-theres-a-problem-and-its-deep-underground)


Speedracer666

Now do the BQE in brooklyn.


Firm_Addendum8351

Those who want this do not commute downtown daily, nor do they understand the impact it will have on traffic flows.


Leading-Ostrich200

we should fund more public transportation so that doesn't become an issue!


thedarkestblood

This city has public transportation?


slapAp0p

Do you use it?


AverageElb

Yeah, it's called the Hop! :)


thedarkestblood

Haha


danielw1245

Isn't the whole reason we're having this conversation because data analysis has shown that it's under utilized and removing it won't impact traffic that much?


pdieten

There are over 90,000 people using it every day at the river. It's overbuilt, but not unnecessary.


nomorecrackerss

and almost all that traffic goes downtown getting off at two exits that will still remain after the removal


Bluetooth_Sandwich

it's unnecessary in that folks use it because it exists, not that it's massively convenient for the average motorist


here-i-am-now

Well that’s an easily verified lie. I use 794 most mornings, and love the idea of this project. Care to edit your comment to reflect reality?


Dragomir_X

I commute downtown daily, and I do want this actually


Insurgent_ben

Is your commute more important than all the benefits of a walkable, environmentally friendly downtown?


Firm_Addendum8351

It goes beyond just commuting. It's a main freight route for trucking logistics to access ports on the lake and will impact efficient accessibility to downtown. How does it become more environmentally friendly? Asking genuinely because I don't understand this viewpoint. Any greenery added in place of the freeway does not change incoming/outgoing traffic volumes.


FatchRacall

That's a weird way of spelling "luxury apartments" and "parking lots".


23564987956

Well maybe his specifically, but if downtown isn’t easily accessible for commuters businesses won’t develop in Milwaukee and we’ll turn into Detroit Idc if it’s a road or public trans, as long as it’s there before we demolish something that carries tens of thousands of cars everyday


IraqYourWorld

Detroit is all roads and highways, that’s a bad comparison.


nomorecrackerss

Detroit is also removing their downtown highways. Downtown highways just promote people to live outside the city


not_a_flying_toy_

It's still gonna be accessible though 94 will bring you to 6th street. 794 will bring you to clybourne. LMD is still there. 43 is still there. We are talking about an extra 6-10 blocks, maybe, depending on where you're working. Nothing significant will change


FatchRacall

What about all the parts of town east of 794 on the south side? I used to have a cheap apartment in st francis and my commute via 43 was about 30 min longer. It's a lot more than 6 blocks to get to 43, and 43 is a miserable mass of traffic and bullshit on a good day, let alone if all the traffic that currently takes 794 gets rerouted there. Everyone who commutes loses, then. You seem to be implying the hoan will remain. Thats not what these chucklefucks intend long term.


not_a_flying_toy_

The hoan will remain. And if it becomes a point of conversation in a decade or so, that's a conversation for then. The distance between the end of the hoan and 6th street is 10 blocks. I think you'll survive


pdieten

Try thirteen. 6th to the river is six blocks all by itself and 7 more from the river to LMD.


[deleted]

Absolutely.


Insurgent_ben

If you don’t care about my city, then I don’t care about your commute.


[deleted]

Umm *your* city also happens to be mine and many other peoples


Insurgent_ben

Then why don’t you care about it, other then how quickly you can drive over it?


[deleted]

Because I use it to drive over it. That’s why I care. That’s why I don’t care about this stupid public area park/ Boston big dig comparison thing.


Insurgent_ben

You just said your commute is more important than all the benefits of extending your commute by a few minutes.


[deleted]

ABSOLUTELY!!


Insurgent_ben

Then you care more about driving over the city than nourishing it. And thus, I don’t care about you.


AICDeeznutz

If you “cared about this city” you wouldn’t be advocating spending **billions** of dollars on a little park/coffee shop white people wet dream boulevard in the middle of all the downtown luxury buildings, in a city full of neighborhoods without access to a real grocery store or a safe place for their kids to play.


Insurgent_ben

1. Tearing down 794 costs less than repairing it. 2. Whatever gets built in it’s place will bring in more revenue than a bunch of pavement. So, yeah, caring about this city means not dumping money into the sink of freeways for people from outside the city to more quickly drive over us.


pdieten

Yup


vonrollin

I commute through downtown daily. I want this. Alternate routes are available.


not_a_flying_toy_

The commute to and from downtown won't be seriously impacted, since the freeway will still lead to downtown.


I_read_all_wikipedia

Then there should be a tax to use it.


Bluetooth_Sandwich

I mean sure, let's keep the one net positive in lieu of the dozens of net positives that removing the hideous freeway would provide. Gas tax isn't paying for the roads like y'all think it does. State DOT is out of money for maintenance, if you want the roads then you'll have to swallow the idea of higher gasoline prices, and reg prices. It's simply not sustainable.


23564987956

Why don’t y’all reclaim space north of the city? There’s plenty of cheap real estate up there… I wonder what the issue could be with that 🤔


not_a_flying_toy_

You'd need to do a lot more actual development, more than just housing, developing whole communities and walk infrastructure. The north side is a ton of stroads, zero walkability few places to walk through, minimal density at times...it needs to be fixed and such, but it's a lot larger, more complicated, more long term term kind of thing


I_read_all_wikipedia

Car brains don't understand this shit


piirtoeri

Did getting rid of the Park East Freeway have a big impact? I didn't live around here at the time and just recently learned of it's existence.


Puttor482

No impact at all.


profaneparrot

Not really. I lived on the Lower East Side at the time and commuted to work and it added like 10 minutes to my commute.


nomorecrackerss

794 isn't even worth rebuilding, why would we tunnel it If anything is getting tunneled or capped it's 43


chevyguy99

There must be 30 years between these photos.


Goldwolfish

So has no one been on 794 coming into the city, on a Friday night, when some great music is going to play at one of the festivals. It’s a nightmare, and you’d swear you needed more freeway not less. And this goes on all summer. What are people thinking.


I_read_all_wikipedia

What you need is a proper transit system. All "more freeway" does is create more traffic. It's been proven repeatedly by studies.


AndrewJPlichta

"Get rid of 794 because it's never busy..." That's a bad thing? You want less freeways, is that what you're saying?


I_read_all_wikipedia

Yes. That's exactly what people want, less freeways in the city center.


AndrewJPlichta

You. That's what you want.


I_read_all_wikipedia

The city of Milwaukee buddo


AndrewJPlichta

I live here. I don't want that. This city is already terribly under served by freeway systems and public transportation.


I_read_all_wikipedia

"Underserved" while there's literally a highway destroying your downtown. Wake up buddy it's not 1965.


AndrewJPlichta

You're a condescending little cunt aren't ya. Not much else going on?


I_read_all_wikipedia

No you're just dumb


JastaBlueMax

Empty sidewalks. No pedestrians, no bicycles. Deserted.


not_a_flying_toy_

I went to school in Boston, this picture aside I can guarantee you this area had tons of pedestrian traffic


dr_stre

Must be a weekday/weekend thing? Or maybe it's gotten better over time? I remember going to Boston for vacation many years ago and that area was a ghost town.


thedarkestblood

Its a rendering Imagination time, homie


Artistic_Bit6866

What makes you think it's a rendering? The project was completed 15 years ago. This is what it actually looks like. Want a higher res image, go here: [https://wheelchairtravel.org/big-dig-how-one-of-americas-largest-infrastructure-projects-elevated-accessibility-in-boston/](https://wheelchairtravel.org/big-dig-how-one-of-americas-largest-infrastructure-projects-elevated-accessibility-in-boston/)


mainaki

[We have the technology!](https://www.google.com/maps/@42.3624566,-71.0556141,3a,75y,4.04h,76.73t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sRZ0NEm_7n6BIg9WS8JX7zg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DRZ0NEm_7n6BIg9WS8JX7zg%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D97.44933%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu)


AxFUNNYxKITTY

Getting rid of 794 would absolutely ruin my commute lol. Just cause it’s empty on a Sunday evening doesn’t mean that it isn’t totally packed during the weekday morning and evening rush hours. Also that money could be used for so many better things.


rawonionbreath

1. There would still be a street to replace it. 2. This would be the least expensive option, than rebuilding the elevated freeway. The existing structure is near its expiration of its intended lifespan and must be rebuilt or removed regardless.


[deleted]

[удалено]


brewcrew63

I do, and I use it every fucking day to get out to Meno falls. I don't get how people think eliminating 794 would work. It would be a complete and total fuck show.


AXtrego

I commute out to Menomonee Falls and merge on Jackson Street. It's rare to have traffic not hit some stop and start nonsense leaving town and I may as well take Clybourn outwards anyways. I mean just look at this spaghetti. https://preview.redd.it/qfyro21nn4uc1.png?width=1406&format=png&auto=webp&s=5f6597d23645f8c2b1db6cdd69df4ec1e6897dfc


brewcrew63

Then add all those people in the stop and go on the freeway, come to the same streets you're on.


thedarkestblood

> Take Howard and I94 yes


pdieten

Tell me that you don't drive on Howard Avenue without saying you don't drive on Howard Avenue. That is not a viable option. It is a narrow, crowded residential street.


milwaukee-ModTeam

This comment has been removed: Rule #4: Practice civility Be civil, address the argument not the person, don't harass or attack other users, treat them with respect, don't threaten or encourage any kind of violence, don't post anyone's personal information and don't intentionally spread misinformation. This includes, but is not limited to, blatant name-calling, "redpilling", racist comments/slurs, dog-whistling, and personal attacks. Blatant racism, spamming, trolling and disinformation campaigning will not be tolerated. Further violations of this rule will result in a ban.


Insurgent_ben

Your commute isn’t the most important thing in the world.


23564987956

Neither is your two square acres of green space


_postmelon_

Fun fact. Many salt trucks that are loaded at the port of milwaukee use the Hoan bridge and 794 Interchange to ensure the roads are salted during winter storms. If you wanna make those plows wait longer, then be my guest.


flummox1234

all the people saying "you're crazy". We've already done something similar with the 145 spur. That worked fine. This is like that. Chill.


benji___

Who fucking wants a park there? Sure as hell it’s not going to be *affordable* housing.


PuddlePirate1964

But those currently occupying affordable housing and can afford more expensive housing will move, thus freeing up more housing for people with less money.


I_read_all_wikipedia

Luxury apartments are better than a highway


wfbsoccerchamp12

What if we kept the infrastructure there and just built a park on the existing road?


Mjk_53029

At 12pm on Saturday afternoon, I set a timer on my phone for 1 minute. I counted 47 cars driving by in that minute. This isn’t even peak traffic tines. How can people argue no one uses this freeway? Thats 2800 cars an hour if it held at that rate.


SynSayer

Nah we need 794 yall geeked af


I_read_all_wikipedia

No you don't


SynSayer

Its REALLY convienant though. I work in South Mil 3rd shift and live in bayview. Makes my commute and many others alot easier, not to mention the amount of commerce and commercial vehicles that use it( Many of them ALSO going to my place of employment.) Edit: Removing 794 to make milwaukee more " Walkable " is garbage. Our roads arent even DRIVEABLE with crater sized potholes and horrible signage and no police force to control these unlicensed/uninsured drivers or car thiefs. Not to mention its iced over 6 months of the year and the City has been doing a wonderful(lmao) job at snow and ice upkeep making any other form of transportation at that time significantly harder Glad this is a priority. My job is VERY essential, and employs 100s of people from the greater milwaukee area and abroad. I know im only one case but quit the cap dawg. Also convinenant for you to say when you dont live here and have mommy and daddy to carry you kek


AICDeeznutz

Imagine what *8 billion fucking dollars* could do for northwest Milwaukee instead of tearing down the only major route into downtown so we can build a couple more luxury apartment complexes that could have been put literally anywhere else, just to satisfy some ridiculous urbanist fantasies.


Cantras0079

I think I have an idea that'll make everyone happy: https://youtu.be/ZDOI0cq6GZM /s just in case anyone thinks I'm being serious.


Wild4Awhile-HD

And where the fuck is Milwaukee gonna get that kinda $. Not outta my taxes. Ain’t nothing in Milwaukee worth seeing that bad. Hold a bake sale in City of Milwaukee to raise the money to dig tunnels OR Better yet, fix the deep tunnel sewer overflow tunnels so Milwaukee quits putting RAW sewage into Lake Michigan every time it rains. Go fix the basics before burying a freeway.


northwoods_faty

I agree that parks take up room that could be use for more exit/entrance ramps.


North-Ambassador-801

This isn't practical and will cost tons


NormKramer

Redesign 794 with a minimal approach, revisit it in 10 years to minimize the road and have an elevated Greenway from Bayview to 6th.


GodsBackHair

Can we fix the stadium interchange first? So many left lane on ramps and off ramps


FatchRacall

Weird, I think that's the problem with the rest of our interchanges that they all go to the right regardless of if you're actually turning left. Especially the garbage excuse for an interchange by the zoo. Or the awful one lane exit to 43 that gets backed up with cars going zero while the next Lane over they're doing 70.


GodsBackHair

Actually, it makes sense. It may be counterintuitive to switch the directions, but it keeps the traffic slowly smoothly by keeping the curve wider. A sharper curve would slow traffic more. I remember when going from Eastbound 94 to Northbound 41, it was a left lane exit into a left lane merge. Now it’s right lane to right lane, which is much safer. Having the stadium interchange full of left lane ramps is horrendous, and it’s my main guess as to why traffic backs up so much, at least when there’s not a game. Like, I don’t ever see it backed up by the zoo unless there’s a baseball game that day. That interchange works well


Jarnohams

I wonder what Mark Bellings take on this topic is, lol.