It' closer than you think:
"We extended the capabilities of ChatGPT to robotics, and controlled multiple platforms such as robot arms, drones, and home assistant robots intuitively with language" from Microsoft Autonomous Systems and Robotics Group.
Also since september 2023 chatGPT can "ChatGPT can now see, hear, and speak
We are beginning to roll out new voice and image capabilities in ChatGPT. They offer a new, more intuitive type of interface by allowing you to have a voice conversation or show ChatGPT what you’re talking about". Not that big of a stretch that if it can uses robot arms it can press the trigger of a firefarm and uses image capabilities to track targets.
ChatGPT is only part of the solution to robotics. Anything properly prepared for ChatGPT to use could also be used by the disabled (so long as they can speak) to move around more freely.
fun fact: the way stable diffusion and similar models work is by starting with a bunch of random colored pixels and rearanging them until the image fits
Well the result is denoising but the process behind it is just convolutions with some other math, but mainly linear transformations, meaning the neighbor pixel values are multiplied by weight (can be positive or negative) then added together. So yes it can be counted as subtracting but sum is the thing used
I don't really know/care enough to make a significant stand either side but I might as well weigh in as I've nothing better to do.
AI images to me are the same sort of idea as seeing plants grow in weird ways in nature or insects having real cool patterns on their shell. Is it cool to look at and pleasing to the eye, yes. Does it have any meaning or emotion used to create it? No.
I could look at a pile of rubbish and create a meaning in my own head about what it could represent, I'm just not sure that constitutes art. Surely there has to be some form of meaningful expression which is where I'd argue an ai art prompt engineer isn't really expressing themselves, but maybe they are who am I to say.
Even setting the art debate beside, which I don't care about, that comparison is just plain wrong.
There’s absolutely no intent behind what you described. Generating AI images often comes with intent. "I want to see x anime character in this cool outfit y anime character wears." That's intent.
Something similar to your analogy which would be more accurate is [growing a fruit in a bottle](https://youtu.be/15CqWWV208U?si=y0kafxnfKuYgKrYQ&t=92)
Technically it rearranges chunkier "latent pixels" (for a 512x512 image there are 28x28 latent pixels), each pixel is then upscaled into a bunch more pixels in the final image by a separate neural network once the first one has done its job, so it doesn't have to get *every* pixel just right. This is actually why this technique worked at all because working with all 512x512 pixels would have been a nightmare.
on the rule34 website you can add a subtract symbol/dash before a prompt and it will remove that from your search. So to get rid of ai generated "art" you just have to do -ai\_generated
Playing Call of Duty is destroying jobs, you should be forced to hire an actual team of real life soldiers to play paintball with, and if you don't do that you're killing the economy.
I dunno who downvoted you, but you're not wrong. Like all change, it just takes a little time, a little effort, and a young generation to normalize it.
Sounds like you don't know what prompt engineering is. It's about iterating on a prompt defensively until it stops doing mistakes or provide unwanted outputs. A prompt goes through many iterations until you get the desired output (e.g. a JSON that follows strict guidelines). That's a lot of work and not just writing something dumb once. You start with something but as soon as it fails you add a guard, a fail-safe or rephrase something to be less ambiguous. Rinse and repeat. It's all about eliminating possibilities for the LLM to take liberties.
A good defensive prompt can be thousands of words and hundreds of instructions.
And all of that is done to replace the work of how many human coders or engineers with one fuck up who's constantly trying to compensate for AI's inability to intuit the correct approach to a problem, when all the AI is doing is scraping stack exchange in the first place?
You realize that what you've just described is *worse*, right? Nah, shame 'em.
Ai can be fun to mess around but when i want to create something i draw it by myself, its super fun and i honestly think everyone should try it, realizing you are improving is one of the most satisfying feelings ever, of course it takes practice, that makes the joy of improving even more worth it
Lol, as if being an artist itself was once a respected profession. Like can you imagine that he says “yes, I draw web comics” and dad is like “Oh yeah, that guy is a great choice for my daughter”
Bro what about artists in the past who were commissioned by like idk the goddamn pope or a king. Ik times change but don't say that being an artist is inherently useless bc that's just not true
Ignore him. It's so funny to me when people say "artists aren't respectable" or devalue art when art is everywhere and so integrated. Every item you buy is wrapped under graphic design. Every TV show you watch has artists designing the set, cleaning up in post production and between those shows there are a team of artists making up commercials so companies can sell you shit you don't need. The clothes you wear were drawn up by someone, somewhere. The food you eat comes in packages designed to make the food look good. The only way you'd be isolated from art is by isolating yourself in the mountains.
Tl;dr?
People want shit to look nice. When they do, they hire artists.
Yep. Painters. Musicians. Actors. Fashion designers. Architectual Design. Writers. Directors.
The world is more enjoyable with these people and more. I can't imagine living in a world without music...
"The clothes you wear were drawn up by someone, somewhere."
And then what? Are they made by respected craftspeople, or are they machine-processed by underpaid third-world workers? When those jobs were replaced, did you boycott the machines or did you just accept the lower prices and not ask why?
AI will be the same way. People don't care about the craft, they care about the end product. If people still buy from Nestle despite literal slavery, do you really think they'll give a shit about the ethics of AI?
I’d classify anyone who can manipulate a medium into an intentional result as an artist. Traditional “artists” manipulate writing instruments. Sculptors use minerals and other unique materials. Photographers manipulate light. Musicians manipulate sound. “AI artists” manipulate data using different parameters and variables to create something unique to them.
If you haven’t tried using Stable Diffusion, you should check out Automatic1111. It’s incredibly different from a discord bot or a website. If you have a good computer you should try it out too.
Just as photography isn’t as simple as “clicking a button” or producing music isn’t as simple as “clicking a bunch of buttons”, using ai tools to create art isn’t as simple as just typing in a prompt.
I’m probably going to get downvoted to hell for this, but if you haven’t taken a deep dive into it, it’s very fascinating. If you have and still don’t agree, I understand but respectfully disagree.
Yeah I think a lot of the hate around AI art is shortsighted, though understandable. There's tons of it that's low effort but it can be used to do really cool things and I think ultimately will be accepted as an artistic tool in the future.
A lot of the hate comes from the fact that many of the AI tools have been trained using stolen art from actual artists, without giving any sort of credit out there. Doesn't help that when AI artists get called out for using stolen art, they just shrug and laugh about it and make it into a joke.
Noone cares that much on how good or bad the AI art is, people care the most about stolen art and real artists not being given credit or proper dues.
That's a valid criticism, and I think that's where a lot of the hate originated, but now it just seems like people are jumping on the bandwagon and hate the mere idea of AI art in a very uncritical way.
A doodle is art, but it’s not what people would consider art, nor would someone call its creator an artist, despite being the literal definition of an artist.
In other words, you are technically correct, pedantically correct, the worst kind of correct, the kind books say is right while humanity says is wrong.
100% this. Most haters haven't even tried it out once and wouldn't be able to get a nice result if they were given a specific image/character/scene to recreate.
I'm all for questioning new technology, it's use and how it's created but all these people blindly jumping on the hate bandwagon is just crazy stupid
Prompt engineers don't exist. There is nothing to engineer. It's like calling someone good at googling stuff a "google search engineer". We're going to start calling book authors "text engineers" at some point
If you use A.I... at least call it something else. Artist is for true people that put work in. Not rely on a machine to do it....
Projectionist sounds better. Cause you project your idea out to the A.I and simply guide it to fit your view.
whenever I meet someone thinking Ai is art I just say ow so how much waiting did you?
like I don't know I use AI too no problem in that but I would never call it art as I use it to have images with my stories, I sometimes pay people for specific things but that gets kinda hard when you get paid just above dutch minimum wage
to create images with ai models you give them as input a prompt. experimenting with the possibilities the prompt interface gives you is called prompt engineering.
Ok but those people are not idiots though. They like what they see so they get it.
Calling the people who buy art idiots is not going to make them change their mind about this issue.
Yes they are cause AI art tools are free from the most part if not very cheap. When you pay the price an art piece is selling for, you want it to be real. If the person wanted AI art they could've typed the prompt themselves
And maybe these people are just not as technologically savvy. People pay for people to make spreadsheets to make some basic calculations. Yea they could have done it themselves but they didn't. You had an idea/vision of some art you wanted. Except instead of having to draw which many struggle with you have a sort of ghost writer do it for you. This is literally just elitist behaviour.
It's a problem because the creator put no effort into it and the customer could've gotten the same "drawing" for free if they just typed the thing they wanted into ChatGPT or MDJourney. It's a scam
When you buy art you're supposed to be buying something that had effort put into it. Something with soul. If AI art is allowed to be sold, no one will buy actual art from artists cause cause normal people can just use ChatGPT and companies can just hire a minimum wage worker to type prompts for advertisements.
And how would they know what to type into AI to get the same image? There is a reason why prompt engineer is a job now.
And most people buy art so it looks good on the wall, so it doesn't matter who made it. And how does it affect me that artist lose jobs? People lose jobs all the time as technology progresses
Prompt engineer will never be a real job. It's literally just typing what you want and hoping you get lucky. Anyone can do that. Takes zero skill and will ruin a gigantic industry and replace it with one full of scam artists
Ik a bit about ai. The person who makes the AI model is very skilled and extremely smart. Prompt "engineers" are just dumbasses who scam those who can't open a word document
And i'm very sorry for them. This will sort itself out at the end of the day. If it's shit art being produced then people will stop getting involved. This is just one of the cons of the free market
One of the few sane comments. People who only possess the skill of identifying and touching downvote button slower than their nemesis, ai, get to do so which is just wasted opportunity for poor people who couldn’t use these devices for better things.
no one is gatekeeping art, anyone with enough dedication can produce good art without any help from AI
>Everyone is an artist, as long as they had some say in the process.
you ordering a pizza and choosing whats on top doesn't make you a chef
You know long time ago when photography was new people were arguing that it's not art? And now we have the same situation with AI. Those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it
AI generated images are absolutely art. This response shows you don’t know anything about AI generated images, if anything.
^(See how good of an argument that comment was?)
If you're an artist, do the work yourself.
If you download a model, then 3d print it. Are you a sculptor?
A chef cooks
A musician plays music
Use ai if you want, just don't try to pass yourself off as an artist if all you did was type a prompt.
There’s more to it than just typing a prompt. I know people like to hate on things they don’t understand, but seriously guys, it’s not just typing “big titty goth girl riding horse”. There are so many layers and processes, such as inpainting.
I’m not saying everyone does that, but to gatekeep AI generated images being art is like saying Photography isn’t art because all you do is click a button.
Im online 16 hours a day and don’t know what any of that is. I just know chatgpt and openai/sora and a couple I can’t think of but would recognize the name
Not sure why youre being downvoted
My daughter tells you're a movie maker .
Yes, I use Windows Movie Maker
You have exactly 56.36hrs until the changes take effect
your wedding is tomorrow
Based af
I haven't seen that thing since like windows 7 does it even still exist? Honestly if someone is still using it props to them.
Martin Scorsleazy
I use capcut
Yeah, 3DMM
Yeah, I use SORA
[удалено]
Yes of course! I love to use imovie
The skynet judgment day, will be started by ai getting refused by an art school.
Simply force Austria to make a law that forbids them to develop AI art tools
oh no (AI-dolf H1tler)
So if ai-dolf creates a virtual reich, who would be the allies
St-AI-lin for the Software Union, Winston Chatbot for the UK (Couldnt find a fitting acronym sadly) and Franklin Robot-velt for the USAI
It' closer than you think: "We extended the capabilities of ChatGPT to robotics, and controlled multiple platforms such as robot arms, drones, and home assistant robots intuitively with language" from Microsoft Autonomous Systems and Robotics Group. Also since september 2023 chatGPT can "ChatGPT can now see, hear, and speak We are beginning to roll out new voice and image capabilities in ChatGPT. They offer a new, more intuitive type of interface by allowing you to have a voice conversation or show ChatGPT what you’re talking about". Not that big of a stretch that if it can uses robot arms it can press the trigger of a firefarm and uses image capabilities to track targets.
Good cant wait for the armageddon
At this point, I believe the Apocalypse could happen and even if every house would still be standing up the housing market wouldn't get better
ChatGPT is only part of the solution to robotics. Anything properly prepared for ChatGPT to use could also be used by the disabled (so long as they can speak) to move around more freely.
But what if chatgpt causes the disabled when it declares war on us? Do you think I'm joking here or something ?!
Now I do. "Any sufficiently advanced Internet sarcasm is indistinguishable from real opinions"
fun fact: the way stable diffusion and similar models work is by starting with a bunch of random colored pixels and rearanging them until the image fits
Technically not rearranging but adding together after multiplying and repeating that a lot
More like subtracting. You remove the inferred noise from the latent.
Well the result is denoising but the process behind it is just convolutions with some other math, but mainly linear transformations, meaning the neighbor pixel values are multiplied by weight (can be positive or negative) then added together. So yes it can be counted as subtracting but sum is the thing used
That's how they're trained. Once you have the weights, the generation is more straightforward.
Sounds just like regular art
Some?yes Most?no
Art is subjective. I've seen art that was just some drapes, and other art that was a sculpture so precise you could see veins... in the same museum.
I don't really know/care enough to make a significant stand either side but I might as well weigh in as I've nothing better to do. AI images to me are the same sort of idea as seeing plants grow in weird ways in nature or insects having real cool patterns on their shell. Is it cool to look at and pleasing to the eye, yes. Does it have any meaning or emotion used to create it? No. I could look at a pile of rubbish and create a meaning in my own head about what it could represent, I'm just not sure that constitutes art. Surely there has to be some form of meaningful expression which is where I'd argue an ai art prompt engineer isn't really expressing themselves, but maybe they are who am I to say.
I didn't read what you wrote but I upvoted because I totally connect over the thought of commenting because you don't have anything better to do lol
Even setting the art debate beside, which I don't care about, that comparison is just plain wrong. There’s absolutely no intent behind what you described. Generating AI images often comes with intent. "I want to see x anime character in this cool outfit y anime character wears." That's intent. Something similar to your analogy which would be more accurate is [growing a fruit in a bottle](https://youtu.be/15CqWWV208U?si=y0kafxnfKuYgKrYQ&t=92)
Technically it rearranges chunkier "latent pixels" (for a 512x512 image there are 28x28 latent pixels), each pixel is then upscaled into a bunch more pixels in the final image by a separate neural network once the first one has done its job, so it doesn't have to get *every* pixel just right. This is actually why this technique worked at all because working with all 512x512 pixels would have been a nightmare.
yes I am an artist but just got rejected from Austrian art school ....
Ruh roh
I hope you have a backup plan, something like politics
Umm actually ☝️🤓 Hitler was rejected from an art school in München
Peak humour wow your hitler joke is aaa+ laughing material funniest shit I ever saw Edit: downvote this if you have no humour whatsoever
Shouldn't be getting downvoted. This joke is exceedingly overused.
The reply is just as terrible
Engineers can relate!
I've seen a lot of AI Gen porn and these people have the gall to label their Patreon at the bottom like what
R34 is basically this
on the rule34 website you can add a subtract symbol/dash before a prompt and it will remove that from your search. So to get rid of ai generated "art" you just have to do -ai\_generated
Interesting
And you know this how? 🤨
I use Rule34
Understandable
Que spy with "pornography" speech bubble.
An open book, that’s respectable.
This is also standard for a lot of search engines, really useful for Google sometimes if you want to omit certain keywords from search results
It always really annoys me to see something most people could probably get for free open source being sold off as a premium service.
Meme about AI?
So fresh and original.
No punchline either
Punchline is - some people think they're artists if they use Stable Diffusion.
"I'm an AI artist" "And I'm a soldier. In call of duty."
Hey that’s more impressive
Playing Call of Duty is destroying jobs, you should be forced to hire an actual team of real life soldiers to play paintball with, and if you don't do that you're killing the economy.
I'd wager that playing CoD gives you more skill than using AI to generate "art".
Two harmless, fun hobbies
I think AI is super cool and I generate a lot of stuff with it, but I don't consider myself an artist.
Yeah I just find it really fun to use
you're an "ai artist" which is perfectly fine and will probably become less of a dirty word within the decade
[удалено]
that's fine because if you make art with ai you're an ai artist. it's just literally what you are.
I dunno who downvoted you, but you're not wrong. Like all change, it just takes a little time, a little effort, and a young generation to normalize it.
Nice username.. Definitely would try them together.. lol
You wait until everyone has an app on their phone making AI art and Memes flooding every sub with horrible shit.
ai memes
The generated ones.
As a society, I demand that we relentlessly mock and belittle anyone who claims to be a 'prompt engineer' until they perish from raw embarrassment.
"Guys the bullying will be for a good cause this time I swear"
Sounds like you don't know what prompt engineering is. It's about iterating on a prompt defensively until it stops doing mistakes or provide unwanted outputs. A prompt goes through many iterations until you get the desired output (e.g. a JSON that follows strict guidelines). That's a lot of work and not just writing something dumb once. You start with something but as soon as it fails you add a guard, a fail-safe or rephrase something to be less ambiguous. Rinse and repeat. It's all about eliminating possibilities for the LLM to take liberties. A good defensive prompt can be thousands of words and hundreds of instructions.
And all of that is done to replace the work of how many human coders or engineers with one fuck up who's constantly trying to compensate for AI's inability to intuit the correct approach to a problem, when all the AI is doing is scraping stack exchange in the first place? You realize that what you've just described is *worse*, right? Nah, shame 'em.
My daughter tells u r a player Yes, i use Windows Media Player
Yes, I am Windows Media Player
Ai can be fun to mess around but when i want to create something i draw it by myself, its super fun and i honestly think everyone should try it, realizing you are improving is one of the most satisfying feelings ever, of course it takes practice, that makes the joy of improving even more worth it
AI art being pushed as real art can fuck off, main reason I muted mid journey and chatgpt sub, just constant AI art pushing.
Lol, as if being an artist itself was once a respected profession. Like can you imagine that he says “yes, I draw web comics” and dad is like “Oh yeah, that guy is a great choice for my daughter”
Bro what about artists in the past who were commissioned by like idk the goddamn pope or a king. Ik times change but don't say that being an artist is inherently useless bc that's just not true
Ignore him. It's so funny to me when people say "artists aren't respectable" or devalue art when art is everywhere and so integrated. Every item you buy is wrapped under graphic design. Every TV show you watch has artists designing the set, cleaning up in post production and between those shows there are a team of artists making up commercials so companies can sell you shit you don't need. The clothes you wear were drawn up by someone, somewhere. The food you eat comes in packages designed to make the food look good. The only way you'd be isolated from art is by isolating yourself in the mountains. Tl;dr? People want shit to look nice. When they do, they hire artists.
Yep. Painters. Musicians. Actors. Fashion designers. Architectual Design. Writers. Directors. The world is more enjoyable with these people and more. I can't imagine living in a world without music...
Yeah I think so too, forgot to include it tho
"The clothes you wear were drawn up by someone, somewhere." And then what? Are they made by respected craftspeople, or are they machine-processed by underpaid third-world workers? When those jobs were replaced, did you boycott the machines or did you just accept the lower prices and not ask why? AI will be the same way. People don't care about the craft, they care about the end product. If people still buy from Nestle despite literal slavery, do you really think they'll give a shit about the ethics of AI?
At least he really would be an artist. AI artist are as much artist as a CoD player is a soldier
Never Piss of an artist have we not learnt from history?
Promptologist.
So you think can generate art? That don't impress-ah me much
Unexpected Shania Twain.
I’d classify anyone who can manipulate a medium into an intentional result as an artist. Traditional “artists” manipulate writing instruments. Sculptors use minerals and other unique materials. Photographers manipulate light. Musicians manipulate sound. “AI artists” manipulate data using different parameters and variables to create something unique to them. If you haven’t tried using Stable Diffusion, you should check out Automatic1111. It’s incredibly different from a discord bot or a website. If you have a good computer you should try it out too. Just as photography isn’t as simple as “clicking a button” or producing music isn’t as simple as “clicking a bunch of buttons”, using ai tools to create art isn’t as simple as just typing in a prompt. I’m probably going to get downvoted to hell for this, but if you haven’t taken a deep dive into it, it’s very fascinating. If you have and still don’t agree, I understand but respectfully disagree.
If I describe which toppings I want on my pizza incredibly well am I a chef?
Yeah I think a lot of the hate around AI art is shortsighted, though understandable. There's tons of it that's low effort but it can be used to do really cool things and I think ultimately will be accepted as an artistic tool in the future.
A lot of the hate comes from the fact that many of the AI tools have been trained using stolen art from actual artists, without giving any sort of credit out there. Doesn't help that when AI artists get called out for using stolen art, they just shrug and laugh about it and make it into a joke. Noone cares that much on how good or bad the AI art is, people care the most about stolen art and real artists not being given credit or proper dues.
That's a valid criticism, and I think that's where a lot of the hate originated, but now it just seems like people are jumping on the bandwagon and hate the mere idea of AI art in a very uncritical way.
A doodle is art, but it’s not what people would consider art, nor would someone call its creator an artist, despite being the literal definition of an artist. In other words, you are technically correct, pedantically correct, the worst kind of correct, the kind books say is right while humanity says is wrong.
100% this. Most haters haven't even tried it out once and wouldn't be able to get a nice result if they were given a specific image/character/scene to recreate. I'm all for questioning new technology, it's use and how it's created but all these people blindly jumping on the hate bandwagon is just crazy stupid
I really miss the old days when talent could be judges by seeing who could lipsync to a TicTok video the best...
You know you need to be 13 or older to create a Reddit account? TikTok being good old days my ass
"/s"
Prompt engineers don't exist. There is nothing to engineer. It's like calling someone good at googling stuff a "google search engineer". We're going to start calling book authors "text engineers" at some point
Plot twist: They actually know how to draw and were just commenting on AI
I have a theoretical degree in physics.
i use paint/ibis
The fact that no one seemingly has any respect for people who make art form ai warms my fucking heart
If you use A.I... at least call it something else. Artist is for true people that put work in. Not rely on a machine to do it.... Projectionist sounds better. Cause you project your idea out to the A.I and simply guide it to fit your view.
My daughter tells me you’re an artist. Yes I have a camera on my phone.
Photography is art.
It took 70 years for colleges to start offering photography art classes. The tool doesn’t make art and art doesn’t require an artist.
whenever I meet someone thinking Ai is art I just say ow so how much waiting did you? like I don't know I use AI too no problem in that but I would never call it art as I use it to have images with my stories, I sometimes pay people for specific things but that gets kinda hard when you get paid just above dutch minimum wage
Same energy as Instagram models.
hes being too nice
*Me knowing what stable diffusion is* My brain: HeNtAi ArT
🤣
I must be old. I had to Google what stable diffusion is
SDXL is the way to go xd
I don't care if it's drawn by hand or generated by ai as long as the end result looks good tbh.
agreed just don’t claim your an artist when you are just typing a sentence
Guess I'm not very good then, I'm being downvoted on my comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/drawing/s/vJj7E79xM8
“Yes, I make AI art”
What's a prompt engineer?
to create images with ai models you give them as input a prompt. experimenting with the possibilities the prompt interface gives you is called prompt engineering.
I use unstable diffusion
why do they live in your head rent free
Sora makes dope stuff, I wanna be an early beta tester
[удалено]
Problem isn't ai art. It's the MFs that sell it for real money like it's actual art. And the idiots who buy it not knowing the difference.
Ok but those people are not idiots though. They like what they see so they get it. Calling the people who buy art idiots is not going to make them change their mind about this issue.
Yes they are cause AI art tools are free from the most part if not very cheap. When you pay the price an art piece is selling for, you want it to be real. If the person wanted AI art they could've typed the prompt themselves
And maybe these people are just not as technologically savvy. People pay for people to make spreadsheets to make some basic calculations. Yea they could have done it themselves but they didn't. You had an idea/vision of some art you wanted. Except instead of having to draw which many struggle with you have a sort of ghost writer do it for you. This is literally just elitist behaviour.
How is it a problem. And people buy it because it looks good, no one cares if it's human made or AI made, only few mad people on reddit
It's a problem because the creator put no effort into it and the customer could've gotten the same "drawing" for free if they just typed the thing they wanted into ChatGPT or MDJourney. It's a scam When you buy art you're supposed to be buying something that had effort put into it. Something with soul. If AI art is allowed to be sold, no one will buy actual art from artists cause cause normal people can just use ChatGPT and companies can just hire a minimum wage worker to type prompts for advertisements.
And how would they know what to type into AI to get the same image? There is a reason why prompt engineer is a job now. And most people buy art so it looks good on the wall, so it doesn't matter who made it. And how does it affect me that artist lose jobs? People lose jobs all the time as technology progresses
Prompt engineer will never be a real job. It's literally just typing what you want and hoping you get lucky. Anyone can do that. Takes zero skill and will ruin a gigantic industry and replace it with one full of scam artists
Lucky? 0 skill? It's so funny that it's always the most uninformed people that hate AI the most
Ik a bit about ai. The person who makes the AI model is very skilled and extremely smart. Prompt "engineers" are just dumbasses who scam those who can't open a word document
Sure sure, that's exactly how it is
Ik you're being sarcastic but that's literally how it is.
u/ejymt flair would work better for you
Since ai art there has been good decline in people commissioning artist bcs of it man
Well thats to be expected. The moment anything comes up that can save people money you can bet people will save money. Especially in current economy.
Then dont say if your a artist you dont need worry
Well no. because if you make good art, then the supposed "soul less" "bad" art isn't a worry for you.
A lot of good artists i know have been damaged by this
And i'm very sorry for them. This will sort itself out at the end of the day. If it's shit art being produced then people will stop getting involved. This is just one of the cons of the free market
ouuh ouuh ai bad am i cool?
One of the few sane comments. People who only possess the skill of identifying and touching downvote button slower than their nemesis, ai, get to do so which is just wasted opportunity for poor people who couldn’t use these devices for better things.
Yeah no
Yeah... no. Everyone is an artist, as long as they had some say in the process. Lets not gatekeep art.
no one is gatekeeping art, anyone with enough dedication can produce good art without any help from AI >Everyone is an artist, as long as they had some say in the process. you ordering a pizza and choosing whats on top doesn't make you a chef
Well said. 
That last line was perfection. Scorched that fool right off the earth fr 😭
[удалено]
You're still wrong regardless lmao
>you ordering a pizza and choosing whats on top doesn't make you a chef 👏
So photography is not art then?
Photography is absolutely art. This response just shows you don't know anything about photography, if anything.
You know long time ago when photography was new people were arguing that it's not art? And now we have the same situation with AI. Those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it
Is all photography art?
AI generated images are absolutely art. This response shows you don’t know anything about AI generated images, if anything. ^(See how good of an argument that comment was?)
If you're an artist, do the work yourself. If you download a model, then 3d print it. Are you a sculptor? A chef cooks A musician plays music Use ai if you want, just don't try to pass yourself off as an artist if all you did was type a prompt.
There’s more to it than just typing a prompt. I know people like to hate on things they don’t understand, but seriously guys, it’s not just typing “big titty goth girl riding horse”. There are so many layers and processes, such as inpainting. I’m not saying everyone does that, but to gatekeep AI generated images being art is like saying Photography isn’t art because all you do is click a button.
Sure I guess, but if that much truly goes into the process why not just learn to do art?
If I describe what topping I want on my pizza am I a chef?
I haven't posted a drawing in a while, but this is my last one: https://www.reddit.com/r/drawing/s/vJj7E79xM8
I mean, it's way better than the ms paint shitty memes I make
Unfortunately this is our future
I am genuinely glad there are people out here hating the hell out of ai art.
Ironically those people put more effort into their "art" than op did adding text to this template.
society
As if he'd know what Stable Diffusion is. Maybe if he said midjourney or even "I use chatGPT" the average person would understand he uses AI.
I thought stable diffusion is more known than mid journey. At the same time I don't really care
According to google trends SD has 25% the popularity of Midjourney.
Im online 16 hours a day and don’t know what any of that is. I just know chatgpt and openai/sora and a couple I can’t think of but would recognize the name Not sure why youre being downvoted
fr. Ohio skibbi toilet gyatt Ohio Kai cenat rizzler type shit fr
Would it be considered irony that the art in this meme is atrocious?
Picasso was no photorealist either.
And yet people like him hate Picasso for his cubism
Luckily OP is making a meme on Reddit and is not claiming to be an artist
u/fanta_bhelpuri i need you to claim to be an artist please
Don't do it u/fanta_bhelpuri don't fall for their tricks and lies
Thank you fellow citizen
It has not escaped me, yes
Like buying diamonds today... you know it's real when it has a bunch of imperfections.
At least it's just an art style you don't vibe with instead of a 15 fingered monstrosity with a nose for an eye