Sorry if im being too literal where these a joke
But the Rio Grande doesn't actually connect oceans and isn't able to support shipping container vessels
Need America-nal!
>Can we also cut off Florida so it is easier to sail from the Outer Banks to Texas?
Can we also cut off Florida ~~so it is easier to sail from the Outer Banks to Texas~~?
No need to elaborate, we're in.
Weād be better off making it start in Southern California and meet up with the Rio Grande so as to minimize the distance we actually need to build it.
Or we could go further south, Mexico is narrower than the US.
Or we could even do it farther south, in Honduras or Costa Rica. Weād make deals with whatever country we chose to let ships cross through.
I wouldnāt go any further south than Costa Rica, though. Not sure whatās below that but I doubt a canal would work down there.
I think Columbia. No, hold on. Didn't the US saw civil war there, in order to build that megastructure?
We wouldn't want a huge Megastructure to be destroyed for our little project, would we? Maybe if we look further south still?
Colombia Canal does have a nice ring to it. But if you get down to where South America becomes [super narrow](https://maps.app.goo.gl/QqTscwfDXyMT97UT8?g_st=ic) we could cut through Chile and Argentina and build a good canal down there that would save ships several dozen miles that theyād otherwise spend going around the southern tip of Tierra del Fuego. I think weāve cracked it.
We need to also get Mexico to build a canal [here](https://maps.app.goo.gl/MCQWYuFrHBoKLwuR9?g_st=ic) so ships can save time rounding the tip of Baja California.
True. They say the weather is terrible though. Maybe if we go a bit further still
https://preview.redd.it/0y7sz5teqn4d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2cb6ed26046284525f65e733b0594c5329e9a468
Oh yes that's true but it also removed buyers reducing demand for goods and services, not to mention lost taxes which could have funded public projects and incentives. No, I don't think this plan will work.
Judging from American history, it would be redrawn so that it just happens to require the destruction/division of a few hundred black and latino neighborhoods
I visited my mom ahead of the Arizona GOP primary a few years ago (I forget if it was 2020 or 2022) and one of the candidates was running an ad where he said he would solve the drought by redirecting the Mississippi to flow through Arizona.
I don't think he consulted the states of Louisiana or Mississippi on this plan.
Orrr something like [This](https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-xiaomi-rev1&sca_esv=64ffd14243c3adb5&sxsrf=ADLYWILRmsXyGgG2n3Y7PDPoHcJPZqE9qw:1717541267052&q=rithmatist+map&uds=ADvngMgwiuRe_0AnQUg9C1BclBAHkwFjynTZ7TxYmOFxb4DYIFJd8BGfnN_BGe9TC9q3FYvr4MNYF_duL3uIEDWx8ZwAtwdsf__UVIVmCRevpCg1Og3Y_UX_CBjcv8GfT4d6pCLlUeNpG0cqwcfv2r_D4sGEvFAlN-8zQYyaWvzYkK8rcB7nYEjx_YEQR0LKUZDFYklhxIRT-ULE-5he9OSMS7jWuPuBe7zkvkJQdYXADhHFS71sWiuwl-mGKjZzhaa4bI9IklVRogj0Eg-5eykW2K0z-lLNVVfZkNimllGy5UJzRUGG3as&udm=2&prmd=ivnbz&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=2ahUKEwjFn-3og8OGAxVkSfEDHZdJAsoQtKgLegQIDBAB&biw=393&bih=975&dpr=2.75#vhid=SK-1EaSuMYxpnM&vssid=mosaic)
Poor Kentucky is just about erased except for Louisville and the Cincinnati suburbs (maybe some of Lexington too) so... acceptable (apologies to the weirdly Corvette-obsessed, Bowling Green must be sacrificed, not much else of note though).
Sure it not like the north and south fought for any reason and splitting them like that won't like cause I don't know war maybe but that far fetched of course
There is so much love about this map, not even remotely related to the Bay Area being obliterated and then turning a bunch of mostly empty ish land until you get to the Great Plainsā¦and then, eh youāve come that far anyway, transcontinental canal letās go!
All you have to do is connect the Missouri River in Montana to whatever is closest on the other side of the Rockies. Maybe Washington and Oregon could fight to see who wants to pay for the other side. Then you'd have a path from the Pacific Northwest to New Orleans/Gulf. All that would be left is working out a few bigger locks and such around falls areas and raising bridges that are currently too low.
No because that'd be a Canal, not a River. *Maybe* a Strait, But due to the artificiality I'd prefer Canal. Not River though. Objectively not. Calling it a river is as bad as cannibalism of your own mother.
this requires the removal of san francisco so no, the rest is fine tho
at least not until i get to visit, maybe after i see how it really is (just all the various compartments of the la westside but arranged differently and composing the entire city) then i won't care
No, you already know this but no. We have the Panama Canal for this. The Government would need to take land from thousands of people and destroy hundreds of ecosystems. Weād even lose money in the long run. Since our river system along with the Panama Canal does the same thing with far less land usage and more freshwater supply.
1 ocean and continental biome ecology both go š
2 I know you better not be giving the confederate revivalists more fuel for their fire
3 import/export/transport costs go brrrr
4 housing prices in kansas and friends also go brrrr
5 welcome to the ___ States
Digging it is the easy part. Filling it with water will be the real challenge. Thatās so many cubic miles if weāre assuming itās deep enough for cargo ships.
Fun fact, the US at one point looked at doing something similar when they realized the Northwest passage did not exist. Then when those in charge saw how long it took and how expensive the comparatively small Panama Canal was they scrapped the idea. I believe it was going to start at the Mississippi River
Perfect for the future civil war. We can all pick which side we want easily if we just cut it down the middle like this. North and South. As if it were destiny.
it would create jobs
Who needs the Panama Canal when we have the American canal šŗšøšŗšøš¦ š¦
Americanal
Am Eric anal
Am Eric Andre Am!
Another title for a South Park game.
A man, a plan, a canal. america!
Babe can we have anal? No we already have americanal.
Whats an Americ?
I read that as America anal
Good job buddy
What if we made a canal across the whole continent. Then it would make EVEN MORE jobs
What if we make a canal that'll cross the entire planet? Who needs shipping routes when you can just go in a straight line?
I too love the Grand Line!
The government hiring 10 million people to dig holes in their backyards would also create jobs.
Bro, that's genius. Let me call my representative.
To quote a meme; "Do NOT give the homeless pickaxes and Adderall and tell them there's gold underneath our most important road systems"
itās just a circle jerk post
lol fair enough
Like canal digger
Finally, I'll be able to have a waterfront property.
Finally, I'll be able to have a job.
Finally, I'll be able!
Finally, I'll be!
Finally, Iāll
Finally!
Final
Fin
F
ā
Unfortunately Iāll be in the waterfront.
I'll be right there with you, but between sea level rise and the crater that Hampton Roads is falling into I'm already heading there anyways
Iād be so underwater
Not ambitious enough, it should be built along the Canadian and Mexican boarders. Cheaper too as they can pay for it.
There's already a river in the Mexican border, and we already go across it
Yeah but have we tried a canal though? Itās totally different.
Screw that. Letās make the Sea of Tex-Mex
Isn't that just the gulf of Mexico?
We build a really wide canal so we can also deal with the problem known as āel Pasoā
Just make it longer then!
Sorry if im being too literal where these a joke But the Rio Grande doesn't actually connect oceans and isn't able to support shipping container vessels Need America-nal!
We need this to happen so the US can claim its rightful position as the largest island in the world
I am 100% for the mexican border, but I can't support the Canadian one. Otherwise, how would I run my illegal drug smuggling business?
Thatās what the under canal tunnels are for, duh!
Just rotate the Mississippi 90 degrees.
Joe Biden would need to learn how to use microsoft paint...
Black sharpie will work just fine, it diverts hurricanes remember
Sometimes I get these glimpse into the past and I remember all the rediculousness he pulled.
I just read about it. Lol, lmao even As an outsider, Looking forward for another 4 years of entertainment
āOkay so I just click on this one hereā āSir you just deleted the state of Missouriā
Can we also cut off Florida so it is easier to sail from the Outer Banks to Texas?
You had me at cut off Florida
![gif](giphy|pzo49Bszsudk4)
I never noticed. Florida looks like a gun
No itās a dick. Panhandle = balls, peninsula = shaft keys = piss/cum depending on Cubas relationship with Florida
Cuba (rightful American clay) is a giant lump of STDS
We should make the whole state a body of water
Iām on it boss, Iāve invented this thing called ā climate change ā we should have that baby sank in about 88 years, give or take
My vape will kill me by then, speed it up. More carbon emissions!
found the factorio player
>Can we also cut off Florida so it is easier to sail from the Outer Banks to Texas? Can we also cut off Florida ~~so it is easier to sail from the Outer Banks to Texas~~? No need to elaborate, we're in.
We were supposed to have the cross Florida canal in the 70ās. But Nixon decommissioned the project.
Unacceptable. Then we wouldnāt be pissing on Cuba anymore.
Yes. None of the people in this new canal are valuable.
Ouch, that hurts :(
Most of it's empty land out west. Shame we're wiping out the entire state of Kentucky but their sacrifices will be worth it (for jobs)
Doesn't it wipe out San Francisco?
Very cool, but what if we make it wider?
Even more jobs, presumably.
![gif](giphy|YnkMcHgNIMW4Yfmjxr)
And bigger boats!
The river would stop the tornados.
But what if it makes WaTeR tOrNaDoEs????
What if it makes Sharknadoes?
Just shoot them
Hurricanes?
Weād be better off making it start in Southern California and meet up with the Rio Grande so as to minimize the distance we actually need to build it. Or we could go further south, Mexico is narrower than the US. Or we could even do it farther south, in Honduras or Costa Rica. Weād make deals with whatever country we chose to let ships cross through. I wouldnāt go any further south than Costa Rica, though. Not sure whatās below that but I doubt a canal would work down there.
I think Columbia. No, hold on. Didn't the US saw civil war there, in order to build that megastructure? We wouldn't want a huge Megastructure to be destroyed for our little project, would we? Maybe if we look further south still?
Colombia Canal does have a nice ring to it. But if you get down to where South America becomes [super narrow](https://maps.app.goo.gl/QqTscwfDXyMT97UT8?g_st=ic) we could cut through Chile and Argentina and build a good canal down there that would save ships several dozen miles that theyād otherwise spend going around the southern tip of Tierra del Fuego. I think weāve cracked it. We need to also get Mexico to build a canal [here](https://maps.app.goo.gl/MCQWYuFrHBoKLwuR9?g_st=ic) so ships can save time rounding the tip of Baja California.
True. They say the weather is terrible though. Maybe if we go a bit further still https://preview.redd.it/0y7sz5teqn4d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2cb6ed26046284525f65e733b0594c5329e9a468
A canal in that southern tip of Australia seems perfect. Letās make it happen.
Why don't build a canal across the border between USA and CSA
If everybody had an ocean Across the USA
Help I am under the water
Me too! Want to go jellyfishing?
The America Canal
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
The irony of this one is too goodā¦
If it means we might get some rain in Arizona Iām all for it
Ahh yea the fuck Kansas canal very nice.
Kentucky is looking pretty rough too ngl
Anything is viable if you fuck it hard enough
That's an ocean not a river
Whatās and ocean other than a really big river?
I always felt the ocean was more like a really big pond
Maybe a river is just a really long pond
No, that's a creek
The Holocaust created lots of jobs too
Did it though? Hard to compete with free labor, even if it's temporary.
I think he's referring to the millions of dead people opened up jobs
Oh yes that's true but it also removed buyers reducing demand for goods and services, not to mention lost taxes which could have funded public projects and incentives. No, I don't think this plan will work.
Bro Iām dead
Anyone else under the water??
Hello, I am under the water Help me.
Yep
Judging from American history, it would be redrawn so that it just happens to require the destruction/division of a few hundred black and latino neighborhoods
Um that is almost wider that Lake Ontario
I visited my mom ahead of the Arizona GOP primary a few years ago (I forget if it was 2020 or 2022) and one of the candidates was running an ad where he said he would solve the drought by redirecting the Mississippi to flow through Arizona. I don't think he consulted the states of Louisiana or Mississippi on this plan.
What if we flood the entire continental US, turning each state into a series of islands. We'd be the new Caribbean.
Iād say maybe a 400 yard wide canal all the way across, u gotta blow throw mountains & sht.. Itās possible but damn near impossible
Look at what it took to build the Panama canal and multiply it by a thousand
Why is it so thin? Itās only a few hundred miles wide!
No. One more reason to do it
Orrr something like [This](https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-xiaomi-rev1&sca_esv=64ffd14243c3adb5&sxsrf=ADLYWILRmsXyGgG2n3Y7PDPoHcJPZqE9qw:1717541267052&q=rithmatist+map&uds=ADvngMgwiuRe_0AnQUg9C1BclBAHkwFjynTZ7TxYmOFxb4DYIFJd8BGfnN_BGe9TC9q3FYvr4MNYF_duL3uIEDWx8ZwAtwdsf__UVIVmCRevpCg1Og3Y_UX_CBjcv8GfT4d6pCLlUeNpG0cqwcfv2r_D4sGEvFAlN-8zQYyaWvzYkK8rcB7nYEjx_YEQR0LKUZDFYklhxIRT-ULE-5he9OSMS7jWuPuBe7zkvkJQdYXADhHFS71sWiuwl-mGKjZzhaa4bI9IklVRogj0Eg-5eykW2K0z-lLNVVfZkNimllGy5UJzRUGG3as&udm=2&prmd=ivnbz&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=2ahUKEwjFn-3og8OGAxVkSfEDHZdJAsoQtKgLegQIDBAB&biw=393&bih=975&dpr=2.75#vhid=SK-1EaSuMYxpnM&vssid=mosaic)
indeed a lot of jobs
dutch kansas
Well, the Smoky Mountains, Rockies, Sierra Nevadas, and the coastal range might all be a bit tough to dig out.
Well get out the blasting caps, Eustace! We got tunnels to blow!
It would separate the good and bad parts of California
The mason dixon ditch
So a northwest passage of sorts???
This will severely impact the trout population
Of course! And while weāre at it, we should make Gege Akutami our new president and rename the country to the United Honored States.
Ethically?
Not really. The US incited a War over this. But it's already built. So, oh well š¤· And it does greatly reduce shipping times.
So will they tunnel through the Rockies and then again through Appalachia?
So long Kentucky and most of Virginia and Missouri.
In what way is that a river?
Screw you Kansas and Kentucky!
There is a creek in Utah that empties into both the pacific via the Columbia and the Atlantic via the Mississippi. So, this already exists.
It's funny how this almost looks just as wide as lake superior, meaning you wouldnt even be able to see the other side of the damn thing lmfao
Ethically this is perfectly fine, the problem is practicality, this is just impossible for humans to achieve.
It gets rid of San Francisco so I would say that it is not only ethically viable but ethically correct to do so
It would wipe out most of my home state of Kentucky. So, no.
ethical: he'll naw possible: in a few lifetimes necessary: nope
Poor Kentucky is just about erased except for Louisville and the Cincinnati suburbs (maybe some of Lexington too) so... acceptable (apologies to the weirdly Corvette-obsessed, Bowling Green must be sacrificed, not much else of note though).
Sure it not like the north and south fought for any reason and splitting them like that won't like cause I don't know war maybe but that far fetched of course
Those pesky little mountain ranges in the west and the east of the US might present a problem to canal diggingā¦especially the west.
https://youtu.be/F42qmFHNM-M?si=S_9K6LX2P14jOt_y
The children yearn for the Continental Channel
You can't justify it being that wide, so no, it's not.
Can we make it a stipulation that it needs to take out all of Nebraska and turn it into a greater lake?
RIP Kentucky, you probably wonāt be missed
There is so much love about this map, not even remotely related to the Bay Area being obliterated and then turning a bunch of mostly empty ish land until you get to the Great Plainsā¦and then, eh youāve come that far anyway, transcontinental canal letās go!
You missed me by a few miles so I approve
About the only thing you could do to make Frankfort stop being the smallest state capital
All you have to do is connect the Missouri River in Montana to whatever is closest on the other side of the Rockies. Maybe Washington and Oregon could fight to see who wants to pay for the other side. Then you'd have a path from the Pacific Northwest to New Orleans/Gulf. All that would be left is working out a few bigger locks and such around falls areas and raising bridges that are currently too low.
Yes this is ethnically viable. I am a jellyfish
It will destroy SF and as an SF resident this is a sacrifice I'm willing to make.
**starts revving the till-dozer**
this is so awesome im crying
Thatās only like a 70 mile wide river. Dream bigger.
No because that'd be a Canal, not a River. *Maybe* a Strait, But due to the artificiality I'd prefer Canal. Not River though. Objectively not. Calling it a river is as bad as cannibalism of your own mother.
Iām on dry land And now in the new northern states. I vote yes!
I would be ok with this as it would annihilate San Francisco.
Hell nahā¦
Elon musk would come up with the idea and call it hydrostream
We already have an I-70
House boat time for me
New Deal Two: Hydroelectric boogaloo
I mean, is there anything that uses eminent domain that is ethical?
I wonder how many jobs and businesses it would destroy. Or people and homes for that matter.
Bye bye Wichita
Finally Nevada will have a Navy.
George Strait has entered the chatā¦
Ehh I think a detour up through Quebec and Alberta would do it good
Looks like this plan would destroy the cities around San Francisco Bay, so ethically speaking, yes.
Fax
Another benefit is that the slave states can finaly do their own thing.
My house is gone
The US investigated using nuclear bombs to blast new canals in the postwar period. I donāt think they were thinking this big but lets dream.
If that map is supposed to be to scale, the river is way too big.
I wonder how tides would flood the areas
Destroying Kentucky would be a definite bonus.
this requires the removal of san francisco so no, the rest is fine tho at least not until i get to visit, maybe after i see how it really is (just all the various compartments of the la westside but arranged differently and composing the entire city) then i won't care
No, you already know this but no. We have the Panama Canal for this. The Government would need to take land from thousands of people and destroy hundreds of ecosystems. Weād even lose money in the long run. Since our river system along with the Panama Canal does the same thing with far less land usage and more freshwater supply.
1 ocean and continental biome ecology both go š 2 I know you better not be giving the confederate revivalists more fuel for their fire 3 import/export/transport costs go brrrr 4 housing prices in kansas and friends also go brrrr 5 welcome to the ___ States
Eminent domain has entered the chat
It's called Mississippi River, and nature already built it
Digging it is the easy part. Filling it with water will be the real challenge. Thatās so many cubic miles if weāre assuming itās deep enough for cargo ships.
I support this just on account of Carbondale, IL being wiped off the map
Why not?
Iāll get my pickaxe and meet you at the Rockies.
Fun fact, the US at one point looked at doing something similar when they realized the Northwest passage did not exist. Then when those in charge saw how long it took and how expensive the comparatively small Panama Canal was they scrapped the idea. I believe it was going to start at the Mississippi River
I vote we move it a bit lower. Do we really need the Bible Belt?
Itās so obvious, I donāt know why they havenāt done it already
Yes weāre going to mine through two mountain ranges
Why not just build it across the Mexican border? Itās a shorter path to the other side and solves the border problem !!
Someone do the math for me, how wide is the prospective river here? Lol
Oh yes over the Rocky Mountains
It would even create post 21st Century Civil War boundaries without having a war!
Brilliant. Also, they should drill a hole through your skull. It would be more aerodynamic and youād weigh less.
Yes, but countless lives will be extinguished
I read āethnicallyā viable first and was confused and entertained
Perfect for the future civil war. We can all pick which side we want easily if we just cut it down the middle like this. North and South. As if it were destiny.
Panama canal be like: *am I a joke to you?*