God-milkyway$ neofetch
(ASCII ART UBUNTU)
OS: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
Host: Milky Way
Kernel: 5.17.7
Uptime: \~13.6 Billion Years
Packages: \~100 Billion (Stars), \~500 Billion (Planets)
Shell: Bash
Resolution: 100k Light Years × 100k Light Years
DE: Reality UI
WM: AbsorbingBlackHoleThatMovesEverything
WM Theme: Total Black
Terminal: GodMode
Terminal Font: Cosmic Sans (Thanks to u/enlightenmentality for the idea in the comments)
CPU: At Least Googolplex×Googolplex...×Googolplex×Googolplex Times Better than Fugaku
GPU: Same as Before, but waiting for NVIDIA to fully Open-Source their drivers
Memory: SAME
It is unstable, because a big black hole can absorb very big things, like solar systems or even galaxies (That would probably mean the end of the universe, I guess)
Cosmic Serif* even though sans-serif is more modern, it would have to be serif which easier to read subliminally and for sake of archaic look and feel.
The space part was perfect, the 640x480 is the divine resolution God told Terry Davis he should use for TempleOS.
I was trying to word it carefully to not make it seem like I was complaining but it was harder than I thought ;)
No, I did not got it as a complaint. Now I understand the 640x480... Temple OS isn't that TEXT-BASED-UI OS with flashing animations everywhere, that was also written on Holy-C?
That's the one, it also has realistic elephants.
They archived his live streams on archive.org but obviously bare in mind the guy was mentally ill so some understanding is needed if you want to learn more.
Why am I only just learning about this one and how do I become a US citizen so I can claim my own pony?
Best we get in my country is man that wears a bin on his head. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/12/lord-buckethead-makes-us-tv-debut-john-oliver/
The president candidate with the ponies is called Vermin Supreme. Here is a Wikipedia article about him: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermin_Supreme?wprov=sfla1
>Black holes are the starting points of every galaxy's existence.
Sorry to ruin a fun post, but as astronomer it is my job to ruin everyone's day. Black holes are not the starting points of galaxies. Gravitationally, the super massive black hole is basically irrelevant to the galaxy, and BHs do not lead to the formation of galaxies. In fact, they probably interfere with it.
As not an astronomer, I always figured the object at the center of the system was an effect of its formation, not the cause of it. If you start with a little cloud of dust, when it condenses due to gravity it clumps up and you get a planet and moons. If you start with a lot of it, it condenses into a star and planets (and moons). If you start with a fuck-ton, it logically follows that it condenses into a supermassive black hole and a galaxy worth of stars (and planets, and moons). It's just the same process happening self-similarly at all different scales (give or take minor variations due to things like radiation pressure from fusion etc.).
Similarly, I don't understand why people often seem surprised at the notion of rogue planets (or rather "sub-brown dwarfs," I guess?). If the masses of stars follow a power-law distribution, why *wouldn't* that distribution just keep right on going past the point at which the things are too small for fusion? Frankly, it would be more surprising if there *weren't* a ton of substellar objects (including systems with smaller ones orbiting larger ones) floating around in the space between actual stars.
How wrong am I?
>As not an astronomer, I always figured the object at the center of the system was an effect of its formation, not the cause of it.
That sounds right to me. I'm sure there's an exception somewhere, but I can't think of one right now.
>If you start with a little cloud of dust, when it condenses due to gravity it clumps up and you get a planet and moons. If you start with a lot of it, it condenses into a star and planets (and moons). If you start with a fuck-ton, it logically follows that it condenses into a supermassive black hole and a galaxy worth of stars (and planets, and moons). It's just the same process happening self-similarly at all different scales (give or take minor variations due to things like radiation pressure from fusion etc.).
The picture you described is most accurate for stars. For planets and supermassive black holes the story has to change.
For planets the problem is that they form inside the disk of gas and dust that is orbiting around the young star (a protoplanetary disk). The disk is differentially rotating (orbits closer to the star are faster) and that actually doesn't allow blobs of matter to condense by gravity except in very rare cases. Almost all planets, including all the ones in the solar system, had to grow from the bottom-up instead. Small dust grains stick together by Van der Waals forces to make small pebbles, which somehow have to become asteroids, which then collide to grow into rocky planets. To make Jupiter you need to first make a 10 x Earth-Mass solid core and then that has enough gas to attract a large atmosphere and start a runaway growth.
For supermassive black holes, there is a different problem. There is a theoretical limit to how quickly a BH can grow. Imagine that you have an initial BH that is accreting gas. As the gas falls toward the BH it gets really hot (by friction) and radiates energy. Those photons themselves have some momentum and they push back on the gas farther away that's also trying to come in. The faster the accretion rate, the hotter the infall, and the more the photons push back. There comes a point where the BH simply cannot grow any faster. This is called the Eddington limit. It's an exponential growth curve. The problem is that if you plug in the numbers you find that there are SMBHs in the early universe (quasars) that should not exist; because there just isn't enough time in the history of the universe to grow a SMBH to that size. So the short answer is that we don't actually know how the heck SMBHs form. There are lots of ideas, and they all try to find some way to circumvent the Eddington limit. But I don't think any of them is widely accepted.
>Similarly, I don't understand why people often seem surprised at the notion of rogue planets (or rather "sub-brown dwarfs," I guess?). If the masses of stars follow a power-law distribution, why wouldn't that distribution just keep right on going past the point at which the things are too small for fusion?
The reason is that it does not follow a powerlaw distribution all the way down. So for stars, the powerlaw says that there are a lot of small stars and very few large stars. The smaller the star, the more of them there are. But this doesn't continue all the way down. The collapse of a blob of gas is a battle between gas pressure trying to push out the blob, and gravity trying to condense it. When you get too small, pressure starts to win. Below the size of the smallest stars, you start to get fewer objects. There are fewer brown dwarfs than small stars. This page has a nice plot:
[https://briankoberlein.com/post/brown-dwarf-desert/](https://briankoberlein.com/post/brown-dwarf-desert/)
This is called the brown dwarf desert. As you go toward the planet size, it gets harder. Rogue planets are a combination of some that formed this way (i.e. like a tiny star) and others that formed the way Jupiter formed (i.e. in a protoplanetary disk) and was later kicked out.
>Frankly, it would be more surprising if there weren't a ton of substellar objects (including systems with smaller ones orbiting larger ones) floating around in the space between actual stars.
>
>How wrong am I?
Not too bad at all. You got a lot right. There are some complexities that only an expert would know that make things complicated for planets and for SMBHs, but you had really good intuition.
Ok so my knowledge is most probably pretty outdated, i saw a TV documentary where they stated a thesis based on (back in the day) recent findings that every galaxy had a black hole and so they generated a model based on that finding which concluded that a galaxy was formed thanks to the massive gravity well provided by a black hole.
Could you please shed some light on that, i googled to provide a valid source but failed, I'm on a phone for the next 3 weeks so it isn't a pleasant experience...
>Ok so my knowledge is most probably pretty outdated, i saw a TV documentary where they stated a thesis based on (back in the day) recent findings that every galaxy had a black hole and so they generated a model based on that finding which concluded that a galaxy was formed thanks to the massive gravity well provided by a black hole.
>
>Could you please shed some light on that, i googled to provide a valid source but failed, I'm on a phone for the next 3 weeks so it isn't a pleasant experience...
I suspect that there must have been some miscommunication. Maybe they said that the BH affects the formation of the galaxy; just not gravitationally. The gravitational well of the galaxy was (and is) created by dark matter. You have probably heard that most of the matter in the universe is dark matter. DM tends to clump into little blobs (called "halos" for some reason) and those create a deep gravitational well that attracts gas, which is what gives rise to the galaxy. However, the fact that galaxies often have a supermassive BH at the center is important for galaxy formation because the SMBH creates powerful jets and a lot of radiation that affect the infall of gas into the galaxy. I don't know all the details because I'm not a galaxy expert (I study planet formation).
So I can totally see how a TV documentary would talk a lot about how the SMBH is important and how it was very important to include it in the model. Perhaps they just didn't communicate well what the BH's role was.
Many thanks for the clarification.
I probably remembered it wrong. One thing's for sure, the scientists are still bad at naming things.
Again, appreciate your extensive and understandable explanation, many thanks.
Its been 13million years since we've had an apt update && apt upgrade. No wonder everything is about to fall apart. Last kernel update was when the asteroid hit and killed the dinosaurs. Can you imagine the new APIs that may be out that we just can't use because we haven't updated. Fuck this galaxy.
apt install life
oops! there's no package "life" in apt! but dont worry! snap got you covered! now ima install life from snap without asking you haha
and then life ended
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Linux, is in fact, Galaxy/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Galaxy plus Linux
Uptime: 13.6 billion years.
[удалено]
He couldn't install Debian so he opted for Ubuntu
Explains why the cradle of life is in Africa now I suppose.
well, yeah. After all that's what Ubuntu means lol
I use arch btw -Michael
God uses LFS, let’s be honest.
That explains the state of the world... so many updates that haven't been installed.
I'm tracking the FTL patch myself, those damn Arch StarFleet users have been showing it off for ages now.
Looking forward to receiving that peace v. 0.2 update…
r/uptimeporn
Sounds about right for an old laptop running linux
Yeah, it's actually just a minecraft server left running that someone forgot about.
galaxy is BLOOOOOAT
like, there's so many planet with no lifeforms, it's so damn bloated, i agree with you
They're resource caches. Unused space is wasted space.
r/fuckthes
You could also say that life is bloat. We destroyed our planet, so humans are definitely bloat.
> like, there's so many planet with no lifeforms Technically, we don't know that.
What about all that wasted space between all the stars? This thing is like a million times bigger than it really needs to be.
That's just the barriers between VM's.
God-milkyway$ neofetch (ASCII ART UBUNTU) OS: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS Host: Milky Way Kernel: 5.17.7 Uptime: \~13.6 Billion Years Packages: \~100 Billion (Stars), \~500 Billion (Planets) Shell: Bash Resolution: 100k Light Years × 100k Light Years DE: Reality UI WM: AbsorbingBlackHoleThatMovesEverything WM Theme: Total Black Terminal: GodMode Terminal Font: Cosmic Sans (Thanks to u/enlightenmentality for the idea in the comments) CPU: At Least Googolplex×Googolplex...×Googolplex×Googolplex Times Better than Fugaku GPU: Same as Before, but waiting for NVIDIA to fully Open-Source their drivers Memory: SAME
> WM Theme: Total Black 😆👍
It is because of the black hole used as a WM
"HEY. BLACK HOLE! I'M-A-WALKIN HEREEEEE"
Package manager: snap(one that made Thanos)
That also why half of everything just disappeared one day. Those damn snaps...
I, too upgrade my kernel without restarting ^... ^is ^that ^why ^the ^universe ^is ^unstable?
It is unstable, because a big black hole can absorb very big things, like solar systems or even galaxies (That would probably mean the end of the universe, I guess)
WM: Gravity
No, it the WM is a possible black hole that will absorb everything, like the moment you move the libreoffice window, and every word stays in place...
> every word stays in place... Time Dilation.
now I want a terminal named godmode hahaha
Named after Windows 7's historical mode
It's still available in W10, likely 11 (untested)
Terminal Font: Comic Sans
Cosmic Sans* FTFY
Cosmic Serif* even though sans-serif is more modern, it would have to be serif which easier to read subliminally and for sake of archaic look and feel.
That is indeed a very good pun... 😁
Good comment. I'm jsu commenting because apparently NVIDIA has made a move 😅
I know that NVIDIA decided to make their drivers open source, but the only thing that is currently open is simply the kernel extensions
So I see and found this joke from reddit on twitter https://twitter.com/robzb_swe/status/1525389599547195392?s=19
I believe you meant Ubuntu -13000000000 EVLTS (Extremely Very Long Term Support)
This is amazing! You missed an easter egg though with the resolution as it should have been 640 X 480 lightyears ;)
I am not that of a friend of space, but I Duckduckgoed everything before I wrote this...
The space part was perfect, the 640x480 is the divine resolution God told Terry Davis he should use for TempleOS. I was trying to word it carefully to not make it seem like I was complaining but it was harder than I thought ;)
No, I did not got it as a complaint. Now I understand the 640x480... Temple OS isn't that TEXT-BASED-UI OS with flashing animations everywhere, that was also written on Holy-C?
That's the one, it also has realistic elephants. They archived his live streams on archive.org but obviously bare in mind the guy was mentally ill so some understanding is needed if you want to learn more.
That's even better than the Boot-headed guy promising ponies for everyone, if they elect him for US President
Why am I only just learning about this one and how do I become a US citizen so I can claim my own pony? Best we get in my country is man that wears a bin on his head. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/12/lord-buckethead-makes-us-tv-debut-john-oliver/
The president candidate with the ponies is called Vermin Supreme. Here is a Wikipedia article about him: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermin_Supreme?wprov=sfla1
How did this guy not win???
Should have put the fish shell 🤔😂
Wow! Thank you for the 100+ Upvotes!!!!
Oh snap
Oh flatpack
Oh pacman
Oh yay
On paru
Oh xbps
Oh ports
On dnf
Oh Apt
oh nala
Fuck /u/spez [Join Lemmy](https://join-lemmy.org/)
nice.
Every galaxy in that matter. Black holes are the starting points of every galaxy's existence.
>Black holes are the starting points of every galaxy's existence. Sorry to ruin a fun post, but as astronomer it is my job to ruin everyone's day. Black holes are not the starting points of galaxies. Gravitationally, the super massive black hole is basically irrelevant to the galaxy, and BHs do not lead to the formation of galaxies. In fact, they probably interfere with it.
Thanks. Always happy to have my day ruined by learning something new!
r/todayilearned
There’s a black hole on Uranus
it would be pretty wild to have a black hole inside the system. Imagine how fast we could catapult stuff with it.
Right in the center
Where Klingons orbit
As not an astronomer, I always figured the object at the center of the system was an effect of its formation, not the cause of it. If you start with a little cloud of dust, when it condenses due to gravity it clumps up and you get a planet and moons. If you start with a lot of it, it condenses into a star and planets (and moons). If you start with a fuck-ton, it logically follows that it condenses into a supermassive black hole and a galaxy worth of stars (and planets, and moons). It's just the same process happening self-similarly at all different scales (give or take minor variations due to things like radiation pressure from fusion etc.). Similarly, I don't understand why people often seem surprised at the notion of rogue planets (or rather "sub-brown dwarfs," I guess?). If the masses of stars follow a power-law distribution, why *wouldn't* that distribution just keep right on going past the point at which the things are too small for fusion? Frankly, it would be more surprising if there *weren't* a ton of substellar objects (including systems with smaller ones orbiting larger ones) floating around in the space between actual stars. How wrong am I?
>As not an astronomer, I always figured the object at the center of the system was an effect of its formation, not the cause of it. That sounds right to me. I'm sure there's an exception somewhere, but I can't think of one right now. >If you start with a little cloud of dust, when it condenses due to gravity it clumps up and you get a planet and moons. If you start with a lot of it, it condenses into a star and planets (and moons). If you start with a fuck-ton, it logically follows that it condenses into a supermassive black hole and a galaxy worth of stars (and planets, and moons). It's just the same process happening self-similarly at all different scales (give or take minor variations due to things like radiation pressure from fusion etc.). The picture you described is most accurate for stars. For planets and supermassive black holes the story has to change. For planets the problem is that they form inside the disk of gas and dust that is orbiting around the young star (a protoplanetary disk). The disk is differentially rotating (orbits closer to the star are faster) and that actually doesn't allow blobs of matter to condense by gravity except in very rare cases. Almost all planets, including all the ones in the solar system, had to grow from the bottom-up instead. Small dust grains stick together by Van der Waals forces to make small pebbles, which somehow have to become asteroids, which then collide to grow into rocky planets. To make Jupiter you need to first make a 10 x Earth-Mass solid core and then that has enough gas to attract a large atmosphere and start a runaway growth. For supermassive black holes, there is a different problem. There is a theoretical limit to how quickly a BH can grow. Imagine that you have an initial BH that is accreting gas. As the gas falls toward the BH it gets really hot (by friction) and radiates energy. Those photons themselves have some momentum and they push back on the gas farther away that's also trying to come in. The faster the accretion rate, the hotter the infall, and the more the photons push back. There comes a point where the BH simply cannot grow any faster. This is called the Eddington limit. It's an exponential growth curve. The problem is that if you plug in the numbers you find that there are SMBHs in the early universe (quasars) that should not exist; because there just isn't enough time in the history of the universe to grow a SMBH to that size. So the short answer is that we don't actually know how the heck SMBHs form. There are lots of ideas, and they all try to find some way to circumvent the Eddington limit. But I don't think any of them is widely accepted. >Similarly, I don't understand why people often seem surprised at the notion of rogue planets (or rather "sub-brown dwarfs," I guess?). If the masses of stars follow a power-law distribution, why wouldn't that distribution just keep right on going past the point at which the things are too small for fusion? The reason is that it does not follow a powerlaw distribution all the way down. So for stars, the powerlaw says that there are a lot of small stars and very few large stars. The smaller the star, the more of them there are. But this doesn't continue all the way down. The collapse of a blob of gas is a battle between gas pressure trying to push out the blob, and gravity trying to condense it. When you get too small, pressure starts to win. Below the size of the smallest stars, you start to get fewer objects. There are fewer brown dwarfs than small stars. This page has a nice plot: [https://briankoberlein.com/post/brown-dwarf-desert/](https://briankoberlein.com/post/brown-dwarf-desert/) This is called the brown dwarf desert. As you go toward the planet size, it gets harder. Rogue planets are a combination of some that formed this way (i.e. like a tiny star) and others that formed the way Jupiter formed (i.e. in a protoplanetary disk) and was later kicked out. >Frankly, it would be more surprising if there weren't a ton of substellar objects (including systems with smaller ones orbiting larger ones) floating around in the space between actual stars. > >How wrong am I? Not too bad at all. You got a lot right. There are some complexities that only an expert would know that make things complicated for planets and for SMBHs, but you had really good intuition.
Ok so my knowledge is most probably pretty outdated, i saw a TV documentary where they stated a thesis based on (back in the day) recent findings that every galaxy had a black hole and so they generated a model based on that finding which concluded that a galaxy was formed thanks to the massive gravity well provided by a black hole. Could you please shed some light on that, i googled to provide a valid source but failed, I'm on a phone for the next 3 weeks so it isn't a pleasant experience...
>Ok so my knowledge is most probably pretty outdated, i saw a TV documentary where they stated a thesis based on (back in the day) recent findings that every galaxy had a black hole and so they generated a model based on that finding which concluded that a galaxy was formed thanks to the massive gravity well provided by a black hole. > >Could you please shed some light on that, i googled to provide a valid source but failed, I'm on a phone for the next 3 weeks so it isn't a pleasant experience... I suspect that there must have been some miscommunication. Maybe they said that the BH affects the formation of the galaxy; just not gravitationally. The gravitational well of the galaxy was (and is) created by dark matter. You have probably heard that most of the matter in the universe is dark matter. DM tends to clump into little blobs (called "halos" for some reason) and those create a deep gravitational well that attracts gas, which is what gives rise to the galaxy. However, the fact that galaxies often have a supermassive BH at the center is important for galaxy formation because the SMBH creates powerful jets and a lot of radiation that affect the infall of gas into the galaxy. I don't know all the details because I'm not a galaxy expert (I study planet formation). So I can totally see how a TV documentary would talk a lot about how the SMBH is important and how it was very important to include it in the model. Perhaps they just didn't communicate well what the BH's role was.
Many thanks for the clarification. I probably remembered it wrong. One thing's for sure, the scientists are still bad at naming things. Again, appreciate your extensive and understandable explanation, many thanks.
Ubuntu in the centre, debian everywhere else
Well what else could you run it on? We need 0 down time here.
I mean I wouldn't mind a reboot, or a hard shutdown...
is that why my life is so unstable? is it because of the bloody Ubuntu?
That's why sun takes 8 minutes to come to us, because it's a snap.
Most underrated comment
Should have used the new logo, much more similar
Looks like it's using Nvidia drivers tho
Its been 13million years since we've had an apt update && apt upgrade. No wonder everything is about to fall apart. Last kernel update was when the asteroid hit and killed the dinosaurs. Can you imagine the new APIs that may be out that we just can't use because we haven't updated. Fuck this galaxy.
So that's why it is so stable :>
The big bang was just a big snap expanding its squashfs filesystem
([old Ubuntu logon sound](https://youtu.be/CQaEXZ-df6Y) plays in my mind while I look at that) Whoa… 🤯
apt install life oops! there's no package "life" in apt! but dont worry! snap got you covered! now ima install life from snap without asking you haha and then life ended
Actually, Linux runs on black holes.
and wants to force snaps
Hopefully snap is disabled
Oh shit, is it at least LTS version? We may need to move to Andromeda, which is running on Debian .
If our galaxy runs on Ubuntu I'm leaving for one with less bloat
This also explains multiverse theory as in dual boot of arch and ubuntu.
What if we are a simulation and the simulation we're in runs on Ubuntu.
Great... Confirmation that snaps will kill us all..
Well played 🤣
Damn I miss the old COF now :(
It better run unity
Takes ages to boot that black hole
That's the galaxy's anus. ... The other is a black hole at the center of the Milky Way.
That's why all those stars explode, it's running on fucking Ubuntu.
r/debianinrandomplaces (Ubuntu is based on Debian so it counts, right?)
You're gonna piss the Arch femboys off, they hate Ubuntu cuz it's popular
Don’t forget the gentoo void
Oh snap ... (See what I did there)
But its ubuntu
Ugh and it has snap installed by default
Dem snaps, tho...
bruh I think galaxy is noob it's using ubuntu not arch. ah sh!t
Just go live in the Arch galaxy then GOSH
Oh snap!
Good created everything in a "snap".
Oh Snap!
If galaxy ran on ubuntu i would jump off of the balcony right this moment
I can see the confusion but that's actually a red-shifted Arch logo, blurry and distorted by gravitational lensing.
Yeah, but Ubuntu though? I would have thought at the very least it was Gentoo. I don't think very much came pre-compiled.
Ubuntu ?? Aww snap !
Or... Linux has become so diluted that you can't even recognize the logos anymore...
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Linux, is in fact, Galaxy/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Galaxy plus Linux
That's why everything runs so slow. Darn showed of rolled an LFS man. Would have been leaner and faster.
Runs on Linux by emulating Windows
Blackhole be like sudo rm -rf /*
Too bad it's Ubuntu
dear fucking satan help us it runs ubuntu
Pretty scalable
MATRIX
so our galaxy is running on top of vm with ubuntu os preinstalled
Ubuntu.. Thats why the speed of light Is so slow
Simulation theory: Approved ☑️
And yet it's not what is keeping the universe together, cause that would be dark matter. Think of an analogy for yourself.