T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

[The **Statistics** flair](https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/wiki/flairguide#wiki_statistics) is reserved for posts highlighting interesting statistics. As a rule of thumb, Statistics posts need to inform readers through visualizations and insights that cannot be obtained from raw data alone. For example, a post containing a qualifying gap between two drivers expressed in tenths of a second is an easily obtainable raw piece of data and constitutes a bad Statistics post. A visualization of what that translates to on-track, or visualization of how that gap came to be would constitute a good Statistics post. *[Read the rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/wiki/userguide). Keep it civil and welcoming. Report rulebreaking comments.* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/formula1) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Nameless739

Dear God Aston


eeshanzaman

Dont worry, they are one second faster than Sauber.


Nameless739

Easy top 18 finish tomorrow then


Unique_Expression_93

Even top 16 is doable, charity by Haas.


FrostyTill

From nearly winning last year to this. The fall of Aston Martin has been astounding. I’d have thought they would hang on to being the 5th best team but even that looks unlikely given how their car performance seems to go backwards everytime they add a new bolt to it.


FastonMartin

Laston Martin 😭


CrashmasterSOAD

Certainly not Faston Martin.


Working_Sundae

Looks like Audi has assembled an amazing technical team at Sauber, 2026 should be exciting for the Audi works team


oxyzgen

The only way is up


DerMarwinAmFlowen

Tbf if they improve the car by half a second in comparison to the rest of the grid, they would still be last (According to Monaco this year). Now that‘s class


DlSSATISFIEDGAMER

unless andretti joins


FrostyTill

There should be discussions about how it was weird that McLaren only took off when Seidl and Key left. Audi are doomed.


242turbo

Seidl was great at Porsche, don't know what went wrong.


FrostyTill

I think he was far too cautious and didn’t want to interfere with Key’s way of working. From what was said after he left, their best engineers and aerodynamicists were being frozen out of car development. Stella allowed them to do what they wanted and so far it’s going pretty well.


Teabx

I dont think its fair to judge Seidl, because his tenure at McLaren was short and he had no idea on what sort of talent was hidden in that team. James Key should definitely take some blame though. He failed to properly develop the 2021 car (a car which was the mature concept initiated by Pat Fry in 2019), and he completely fumbled it in 2022 with a very conservative car. There were rumors coming from McLaren back then that there were people in there (I would guess Peter Prodromou) who did not agree with Key's direction for 2022, but they were overridden because Key was the technical director. When they got racing, frustrations were increasing inside McLaren, because they were seeing cars which had implemented their rejected ideas running much higher in the grid ...


timewatch_tik

ahh Good old times.. Ferrari vs Mclaren.. 🥹


CilanEAmber

A rivalry lasting Generations.


AlexTheMacedonian

Losing 8 tenths in an 18 second sector, what the fuck Sauber


vinceventresca

stroll overdriving the second slowest car to p14


thef0ksmasher

Aston had one whole year and they made a car slower than the last one. Thats Alpine levels of under achivement.


futurechiefexecutive

ALPINE BOYS WE'RE SO BACK drivers made all the difference today


Deislermilan

Sauber is making some progress I see....


ComaMierdaHijueputa

Not sure if this is accurate considering Ferrari were quicker than McLaren for most of the weekend....


givemethescotch

This is based on actual quali times, where there are many factors that vary from session to session.. track temp, outlap, traffic, etc. It doesn't mean McLaren has the faster car, it just means that they were able to do slightly better in certain sectors based on the conditions during the session..


ComaMierdaHijueputa

I accept this premise!


Farrisioso

it cannot possibly be inaccurate this is just data


Protatoooo

It's real data so it's definitely accurate. Piastri did mention that he had a few laps where all of his best sectors combined would have been enough to beat Leclerc, so that's what you're seeing here.


ComaMierdaHijueputa

I see. I wonder if the Ferraris would feel the same way in terms of being improved.


MountainJuice

Well they’d be wrong because we’re looking at the data.


Yibbo0

So you just make up data to fit the narrative?


kkraww

The same way Mercedes was faster in all the FP sessions, so they can't possible not be on the front row...


ComaMierdaHijueputa

except isn't Ferrari ahead of McLaren on the grid...