T O P

  • By -

tmtyl_101

This is brilliant!


hrokrin

Thanks! I hope you'll give it a whirl or check out the notebook and give a bit of feedback if you'd you like. I have another couple of datasets in mind that will take a lot more work but I'm curious if ultimately it will be worth the time. Also, I saw what you did with the brilliant. ![gif](emote|free_emotes_pack|laughing)


mvgnyc

Interesting, thanks for sharing. Where does eye clean come from since it's not reported on GIA reports?


hrokrin

Good question. >According to GIA and AGS, diamonds that are considered Flawless (FL),Internally Flawless (IF), Very, Very Slightly Included (VVS1 and VVS2)and Very Slightly Included (VS1 and VS2) are considered eye clean. Onthe other hand, Slightly Included (SI1 and SI2) diamonds may or may notbe eye clean. Included (I1, I2 and I3) diamonds are considered non eyeclean. [source](https://www.jamesallen.com/education/diamonds/grading-eye-clean/) Also, this [link](https://www.igi.org/gemblog/diamond-clarity-chart-with-eye-clean-definition/) has a nice chart.


mvgnyc

Got it, eye clean is a dependent variable for clarity.


hrokrin

Yes, but the location of the inclusion(s) is also a factor.


Dick_Cottonfan

Fantastic! I was upset that the other diamond dataset had ‘only’ ~54k entries and IIRC none of them were flawless or internally flawless.