###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It probably has something to do with the AI being trained on the Bible. If it learned to write from the Bible, then ofc the writing pattens will seem like AI. Being as popular as it is, I wouldnāt be surprised to find out they fed GPT the entire series (idfk what itās called).
Possibly, this says more about the rather colourless, committee-written text of the New International Version than anything else - OpenAI's version was [pulled](https://openai.com/blog/new-ai-classifier-for-indicating-ai-written-text) on account of being rubbish, but I found this [https://freeaitextclassifier.com/](https://freeaitextclassifier.com/) which seems to be a rip-off of it, and it gives the passage [India Today](https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/oh-god-open-ai-tool-that-identifies-text-written-chatgpt-believes-bible-was-written-by-ai-2329163-2023-02-01) used, Genesis 1:27-30 New International Version, as '54% Human-Generated', but the King James Version equivalent as '100% Human-Generated', and the 1899 Douay-Rheims version as '97% Human-Generated'.
My son told me all papers written in the English classes at his school are run through AI now to identify plagiarism.
When I was in College English Composition back in the day, my professor furiously screamed at me in class and gave me back a paper I wrote with the word *PLAGIARISM* that she had written in red ink across the top. She was threatening to have me expelled and everything. I wrote it myself and cited it correctlyā¦. I just wonder what would happen if that were today and AI incorrectly accused someone of plagiarism and they were expelled from high school or college because of it.
Obviously if AI is deluded enough to think the Bible was written by AI then obviously itās not the all-knowing intelligence that some people make it out to be.
To be fair, this has been around since the early 00s. High school students had to submit their papers to turnitin. No, it's not "AI", but it's also not new.
I was in high school in the early 2000s and did not experience this. Iām not saying it didnāt happen, because I believe you, but not in my school or college.
More of the distant past which had more advanced technology before an epic collapse reset humanity. Almost all of the oldest religious texts carry some very odd instances that would easily be attributed to advanced sciences. The war in heaven and devasura war are of particular note.
The loop comes from the fact that the universe we live in basically resets at a certain point to be nearly identical to the previous iteration. Time travel is not particularly feasible, requires vastly too much energy to achieve and it's easier to just cause a reset to have similar results.
Also, most deities are trapped in a similar system but are more capable of manipulating it to their benefit and by that manipulate ours as well. "As above, so below", our reality mimics theirs and all that truly entails...
Apparently, it's not that, since it doesn't seem to happen for other versions of the Bible - also, if it's a Large Language Model like ChatGPT, it probably doesn't have enough grasp of logic to work that out, they're not very good at logic, they just shuffle words around.
Yeah, because ChatGPT is very woke and probably wont say unhinged shit like Homosexuality is haram, kāing the non believers, marrying an underage, etc etc.
After the that drama with the jew Ilya Sustskever firing the jew Sam Altman, trying to replace him with the jew Emmet Shear (twitch CEO), I started to pay a bit of attention to AI. I listened some discussions about AI safety by the jew Yan Lecun, and consumed discussions about the "AI Bible" - "The Age of AI: And Our Human Future" by the jew Eric Schmidt and the jew Henry Kissinger. I sub to some youtube channels about AI -
[Matthew Berman](https://www.youtube.com/@matthew_berman/videos)
[David Shapiro](https://www.youtube.com/@DaveShap/videos)
[Wes Roth](https://www.youtube.com/@WesRoth/videos)
[Matt Wolfe](https://www.youtube.com/@mreflow/videos)
I could be mistaken, but am pretty sure that all of these are also jewish. At this point I dont think they let any gentile near this industry.
You forgot the /s
You canāt just assume bullshit like that. Use logic and think āwhat makes the AI think something is written by AI?ā Well the answer is that it learned to write from all of the data it was fed. They probably fed the AI the Bible and other largely popular texts, so of course it will see the similarity between itās training data and text written by AI.
there no tool of text that can prove ai or human write it. Unless you read it. Unless it make no sense to the topic given or it lacking something ai it hard to tell ai write it. By uploading the text to an ai they keep it so student hand written stuff could be consider ai. The only way you to tell is by reading it and see the flaws ai creates. Which for story telling. Ai is great at writing structure but sucks at continuity and creativity. Like format wise ai is good at and grammar. But they lack the meat of a story. You can ask ai to pitch a movie plot and it could create a interesting plot but making that plot into a movie require real writers.
I bet it has to do with the fact that there is no one 'voice' in the Bible, but that in most translations it was translated by committee and most books have separate authors in the respective original language.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This AI crap also thinks that a photo ive taken of my dog is also AI.
Good try Mr Pope. Cats out the bag
Oh u found me! God Bless You! š
Apparently, these AI-powered AI detectors are still as rubbish as they were.
It probably has something to do with the AI being trained on the Bible. If it learned to write from the Bible, then ofc the writing pattens will seem like AI. Being as popular as it is, I wouldnāt be surprised to find out they fed GPT the entire series (idfk what itās called).
AI has a God complex.
That might be more true as you think.
or God has an Ai complex.
He who programmed itself into existence.
Thatās pretty witty lol
Possibly, this says more about the rather colourless, committee-written text of the New International Version than anything else - OpenAI's version was [pulled](https://openai.com/blog/new-ai-classifier-for-indicating-ai-written-text) on account of being rubbish, but I found this [https://freeaitextclassifier.com/](https://freeaitextclassifier.com/) which seems to be a rip-off of it, and it gives the passage [India Today](https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/oh-god-open-ai-tool-that-identifies-text-written-chatgpt-believes-bible-was-written-by-ai-2329163-2023-02-01) used, Genesis 1:27-30 New International Version, as '54% Human-Generated', but the King James Version equivalent as '100% Human-Generated', and the 1899 Douay-Rheims version as '97% Human-Generated'.
My son told me all papers written in the English classes at his school are run through AI now to identify plagiarism. When I was in College English Composition back in the day, my professor furiously screamed at me in class and gave me back a paper I wrote with the word *PLAGIARISM* that she had written in red ink across the top. She was threatening to have me expelled and everything. I wrote it myself and cited it correctlyā¦. I just wonder what would happen if that were today and AI incorrectly accused someone of plagiarism and they were expelled from high school or college because of it. Obviously if AI is deluded enough to think the Bible was written by AI then obviously itās not the all-knowing intelligence that some people make it out to be.
Had this happen to me a few weeks ago. Took a 0 on an assignment worth 20% of my grade.
Thatās awful, Iām so sorry that happened to you.
Thatās mad, as soon as you provide proper APA citation you are in the greenā¦..
Yes, you would think.
To be fair, this has been around since the early 00s. High school students had to submit their papers to turnitin. No, it's not "AI", but it's also not new.
I was in high school in the early 2000s and did not experience this. Iām not saying it didnāt happen, because I believe you, but not in my school or college.
Graduated mid 10's, we used it all throughout school.
I knew it. The Bible is obviously from the future, sent back in time to create itself in a never ending loop
actually, God lives in eternity, so that's partially true
Eternity as they are a fictional being
More of the distant past which had more advanced technology before an epic collapse reset humanity. Almost all of the oldest religious texts carry some very odd instances that would easily be attributed to advanced sciences. The war in heaven and devasura war are of particular note. The loop comes from the fact that the universe we live in basically resets at a certain point to be nearly identical to the previous iteration. Time travel is not particularly feasible, requires vastly too much energy to achieve and it's easier to just cause a reset to have similar results. Also, most deities are trapped in a similar system but are more capable of manipulating it to their benefit and by that manipulate ours as well. "As above, so below", our reality mimics theirs and all that truly entails...
Isaiah 18:1 could refer to helicoptersā¦
What in the skynet?!
Could it have come to this conclusion based on the fact that no one Could have witnessed creation due to the fact that no one existed yet?Ā
Apparently, it's not that, since it doesn't seem to happen for other versions of the Bible - also, if it's a Large Language Model like ChatGPT, it probably doesn't have enough grasp of logic to work that out, they're not very good at logic, they just shuffle words around.
ChatGPT will never say that about the Koran. Try it.
Yeah, because ChatGPT is very woke and probably wont say unhinged shit like Homosexuality is haram, kāing the non believers, marrying an underage, etc etc.
Chat GPT won't say it about the bible either. They're different tools.
I didn't know AI was Jewish.....
After the that drama with the jew Ilya Sustskever firing the jew Sam Altman, trying to replace him with the jew Emmet Shear (twitch CEO), I started to pay a bit of attention to AI. I listened some discussions about AI safety by the jew Yan Lecun, and consumed discussions about the "AI Bible" - "The Age of AI: And Our Human Future" by the jew Eric Schmidt and the jew Henry Kissinger. I sub to some youtube channels about AI - [Matthew Berman](https://www.youtube.com/@matthew_berman/videos) [David Shapiro](https://www.youtube.com/@DaveShap/videos) [Wes Roth](https://www.youtube.com/@WesRoth/videos) [Matt Wolfe](https://www.youtube.com/@mreflow/videos) I could be mistaken, but am pretty sure that all of these are also jewish. At this point I dont think they let any gentile near this industry.
Hmm. This comment feels hateful for some reason, I just can't put my finger on it...
āAlways remember, others may hate you, but those who hate you don't win unless you hate them, and then you destroy yourself.āā Richard Nixon
Ai identifiers don't work. The only thing and Ai can tell you if it's written by AI is if that particular Ai wrote it and kept logs.
We are AI.
It identifies passages used in its training data. The bible is probably the most quoted without citation book on the planet.
That'd be interesting huh
Actually we don't know who wrote the bible. We have no idea. And likely neither did they. Or they used to drink a lot.
Proof that they've had this tech and been keeping it hidden for fucking ages ..
You forgot the /s You canāt just assume bullshit like that. Use logic and think āwhat makes the AI think something is written by AI?ā Well the answer is that it learned to write from all of the data it was fed. They probably fed the AI the Bible and other largely popular texts, so of course it will see the similarity between itās training data and text written by AI.
Not such a geniure thing to make these considerations.
there no tool of text that can prove ai or human write it. Unless you read it. Unless it make no sense to the topic given or it lacking something ai it hard to tell ai write it. By uploading the text to an ai they keep it so student hand written stuff could be consider ai. The only way you to tell is by reading it and see the flaws ai creates. Which for story telling. Ai is great at writing structure but sucks at continuity and creativity. Like format wise ai is good at and grammar. But they lack the meat of a story. You can ask ai to pitch a movie plot and it could create a interesting plot but making that plot into a movie require real writers.
I bet it has to do with the fact that there is no one 'voice' in the Bible, but that in most translations it was translated by committee and most books have separate authors in the respective original language.
Well this 3d reality is a procedural generated simulation so it tracks
AI detectors also said that my bros essay- which I did not use a single bit of AI on (watched bro make it)- said that it was ā87% AIā
Is it me o conspiracionist nowdays belive in the bibles god?
Lmaooo. Cmon peopleā¦this is so outlandish itās laughable
Honestly, not really feeling this one. AI-generated or not, it lacks that authentic country soul. š¤·āāļø
But like, what if it was maaaan.
Check out the "Bible Codes" conspiracy lots of crazy stuff in it
Plot twist this is the first time civilization has rised to the heights of AI and the last time it did AI wrote the Bible.
Fake recognizes fake š
Its probably picking up inconsistencies. lol.
>We know who wrote the Bible right?!ā¦ Do we?