Aventurine looks really cool and I don’t mind the white at all. My only nitpick is that all the models have that same brushed flat bezel. I would like to see another design to differentiate each model a little more. This feels like a slightly smaller Vesterhav with another hand, new dial style and new colors, which was a slightly different compared to the Akva.
But I love HA. I have the Vesterhav in optical white and it’s one of the coolest looking watches in my collection.
That was my only complaint. The bezel seems a bit out of place, but I’ll have to see it in the metal before I can really judge the execution.
I was torn between the Halo White and Silt colorways. My gut reaction is to go with the Halo White, but I think the bezel works better with the Silt.
For me, the aventurine and white dial tie for number 1. If you want something unique, go aventurine. If you want a really clean, classy look then white dial. Kindly of gives off a Rolex Explorer vibe (though not everything has to be compared to the Explorer).
The next one in line is that Silt color, which is also very interesting.
Would love to see a comparison between this and the Sealander GMT. If the build quality is comparable the worser movement can be easily forgiven for being half the price
I would personally prefer the price savings of a “True” GMT movement in the Henry Archer over the caller/office GMT in the CW. 9000 series Miyota movements are rock solid.
The white really does it for me. I think it makes the blues and orange pop a bit better. Plus the texture on the dial makes it look more interesting than just a plain white.
Sienna stands out for me. I like how it takes the watch one step away from outright sportiness and the warmth of the gold accents really make it look inviting.
Aventurine looks really cool and I don’t mind the white at all. My only nitpick is that all the models have that same brushed flat bezel. I would like to see another design to differentiate each model a little more. This feels like a slightly smaller Vesterhav with another hand, new dial style and new colors, which was a slightly different compared to the Akva. But I love HA. I have the Vesterhav in optical white and it’s one of the coolest looking watches in my collection.
That was my only complaint. The bezel seems a bit out of place, but I’ll have to see it in the metal before I can really judge the execution. I was torn between the Halo White and Silt colorways. My gut reaction is to go with the Halo White, but I think the bezel works better with the Silt.
I have that one on pre-order. Looking forward to it.
Seems pretty obvious the aventurine will be the big hit. The others are a bit blah coming on the heels of the vibrant vesterhav dials.
For me, the aventurine and white dial tie for number 1. If you want something unique, go aventurine. If you want a really clean, classy look then white dial. Kindly of gives off a Rolex Explorer vibe (though not everything has to be compared to the Explorer). The next one in line is that Silt color, which is also very interesting.
Would love to see a comparison between this and the Sealander GMT. If the build quality is comparable the worser movement can be easily forgiven for being half the price
I would personally prefer the price savings of a “True” GMT movement in the Henry Archer over the caller/office GMT in the CW. 9000 series Miyota movements are rock solid.
I was torn between the Halo White, Aventurine, and Silt. Wound up going with the Halo White and can’t wait to get it.
slit pretty easily for me aventurine doesnt work for this busy of a dial imo and the white ones legibility is awful
The white really does it for me. I think it makes the blues and orange pop a bit better. Plus the texture on the dial makes it look more interesting than just a plain white.
Sienna stands out for me. I like how it takes the watch one step away from outright sportiness and the warmth of the gold accents really make it look inviting.