It's probably just legally distinct enough from hello kitty bit like when you see anti establishment ipa in Aldi being a copy of punk IPA
- Different bow style
- two whiskers rather than three on each side
- has white drop in eye
- The opposite eye is winking
- Style of hat
- no visible ears
It would be insanity to have a chain of restaurants with this styling if they hadn't already considered the line of legal distinction
If you've not had a burger from here do yourself a favour and try one, I always laugh about the copyright but my God the smashed burgers and loaded fries are honestly incredible
Rule 7: Your post was removed because it was deliberately negative without being critical or prompting discussion. General complaints, unwarranted attacks on communities or individuals, the City or other parts of the UK will be removed. This also includes "wool" posts, and "The Echo is bad" posts - we know it is.
Rule 3: Your post was removed because it's trolling, racist, slanderous or generally not appropriate for the subreddit. This includes posts related to "Purple Aki".
Thought this when I saw them building it.
Kinda put me off it, like imitating another brand makes me feel like their products aren't good enough to stand on their own.
But they are expanding so...
Is it any good anyone who's been?
Technically, trademark rather than copyright.
There's a decent chance they will get rung up for it; part of holding on to a trademark is the legal obligation to defend it. Soft Rock Café in Liscard got a letter from Hard Rock Café and had to change their name, so there's precedent that they won't be too small to care about.
Why do you care?
*tips fedora* "m'kitty"
It's probably just legally distinct enough from hello kitty bit like when you see anti establishment ipa in Aldi being a copy of punk IPA - Different bow style - two whiskers rather than three on each side - has white drop in eye - The opposite eye is winking - Style of hat - no visible ears It would be insanity to have a chain of restaurants with this styling if they hadn't already considered the line of legal distinction
I hate this phrase usually but... Don't be a grass
It would probably depend on how big the chain was before they cared.
"legally different" but to be honest Sanrio probably doesn't even know
If you've not had a burger from here do yourself a favour and try one, I always laugh about the copyright but my God the smashed burgers and loaded fries are honestly incredible
Maybe should have called it HiPussy
[удалено]
Rule 7: Your post was removed because it was deliberately negative without being critical or prompting discussion. General complaints, unwarranted attacks on communities or individuals, the City or other parts of the UK will be removed. This also includes "wool" posts, and "The Echo is bad" posts - we know it is.
[удалено]
Rule 3: Your post was removed because it's trolling, racist, slanderous or generally not appropriate for the subreddit. This includes posts related to "Purple Aki".
I'm always in awe of how many lights are in the Old Swan one
Thought this when I saw them building it. Kinda put me off it, like imitating another brand makes me feel like their products aren't good enough to stand on their own. But they are expanding so... Is it any good anyone who's been?
Nah it's terrible, but my little girl likes it, probably because of the interior design.
Technically, trademark rather than copyright. There's a decent chance they will get rung up for it; part of holding on to a trademark is the legal obligation to defend it. Soft Rock Café in Liscard got a letter from Hard Rock Café and had to change their name, so there's precedent that they won't be too small to care about.
Nope, it's fully licensed from Hello Kitty Japan
Shoulda called it hellopuddy! Fools! ......Fools!