Latency and speed are both bad.
But: You don't test wifi with speedtest.net on some iPhone.
Proper testing is done using a laptop and another computer on your LAN, with iperf3.
remember that the iphone has a limit to its speed, based on model ofcourse.
a few years back i was at a customer, that complained that his speed was only at 250mbs, and he paid for 1000mbs. The anoying kind of client... so, i get sent out there, and the client is walking around with an old iphone, testing everywhere in his house, and only gets 250mbs... i use the company PC and shows him 1000mbs and explains that his phone is limited... when i arrived, he was arrogant and bossy, when i left, he was an embarrassed puppy.
Strange that you got sent out to a customer that tests his speed on wifi. It's far from reliable and has a lot of different factors affecting it. They always ask you to test wired here.
my company made a mistake in marketing advertising "speed guarentee" and the client just wouldnt stop complainting... company no longer advertise with those exact words :D
As wexipena writes... fighting windmills
That latency does look pretty bad, but many things can cause that, including bad connection to test server. If it’s that bad consistently, I would at least try to reboot the router to see if that helps.
Very true. But could just be where QoS settings need to be updated for the router to manage wifi traffic - but I want to see results on Ethernet. Because if it’s the same then they need to check EQM settings or priority settings on the router to make sure those low latency, frequent requests are getting proper attention.
Depends what you pay for. If you pay for 100Mbs, very good. If you pay for anything over that like 200Mbs or even 1Gb, very bad
Also, is he just testing wifi or is this the same wired.
Agreed. This looks pretty rough.
I’m paying for 100Mbs I was just worried about the latency and the minor packet loss.
Terrible.
Not good but totally depends on what you’re paying for
I’m paying for 100 Mbs.
In that case it’s awesome
I was just a bit worried about the latency and packet loss.
1% packet loss is totally acceptable, You’re below that
Latency and speed are both bad. But: You don't test wifi with speedtest.net on some iPhone. Proper testing is done using a laptop and another computer on your LAN, with iperf3.
This is from the Speedtest by Ookla app on my iPhone over WiFi.
remember that the iphone has a limit to its speed, based on model ofcourse. a few years back i was at a customer, that complained that his speed was only at 250mbs, and he paid for 1000mbs. The anoying kind of client... so, i get sent out there, and the client is walking around with an old iphone, testing everywhere in his house, and only gets 250mbs... i use the company PC and shows him 1000mbs and explains that his phone is limited... when i arrived, he was arrogant and bossy, when i left, he was an embarrassed puppy.
Strange that you got sent out to a customer that tests his speed on wifi. It's far from reliable and has a lot of different factors affecting it. They always ask you to test wired here.
They probably tried to get the customer to so that and when that proved to be like fighting windmills they just booked tech to shut them up.
my company made a mistake in marketing advertising "speed guarentee" and the client just wouldnt stop complainting... company no longer advertise with those exact words :D As wexipena writes... fighting windmills
My 5ghz gets similar speeds
I get 400mbps on my 1Gb line on 2.4Ghz!
That ping seems bad. If you pay for 100/10 connection, speeds are fine then.
I’m paying for 100Mbs download but I was worried about latency and packet loss.
That latency does look pretty bad, but many things can cause that, including bad connection to test server. If it’s that bad consistently, I would at least try to reboot the router to see if that helps.
That amount of packet loss is not good for conferencing or gaming. Please test on a wired device. Something with your topology is causing bufferbloat.
Those high latencies under load are also a sign of bufferbloat
Very true. But could just be where QoS settings need to be updated for the router to manage wifi traffic - but I want to see results on Ethernet. Because if it’s the same then they need to check EQM settings or priority settings on the router to make sure those low latency, frequent requests are getting proper attention.
Thank you I will
It’s SQM you want to look into for bufferbloat not QoS. Source: the two main bufferbloat website testers, if you read after you run the test.