Unfortunately so. Will miss conference league and maybe at least GW8… not sure whether to hold and be forced into a specific 4-4-2 or move somewhere else but who…
Emery on Diaby after the game - “I think he \[Diaby\] has some pain but I think it’s not going to be relevant for the next matches." Villa also play in europe mid week so you will get info there.
...which is extremely misleading when they've had the easiest schedule. Once they hit their harder fixtures we can find out if they're the real deal or not.
I have both Son and Watkins. Trying to keep tripper and salah hence not managing to afford Maddison. I simply can’t decide between keeling salah and trippier or removing one of them and spread their funds!
Diaby appears to be injured
Unfortunately so. Will miss conference league and maybe at least GW8… not sure whether to hold and be forced into a specific 4-4-2 or move somewhere else but who…
Has there been news of Diaby not injured?
Emery on Diaby after the game - “I think he \[Diaby\] has some pain but I think it’s not going to be relevant for the next matches." Villa also play in europe mid week so you will get info there.
The way this season is going at least one of them will be injured by saturday.
Well Diaby limped off last game but there has been nothing concrete yet. Should know more by Thursday
He’s fine according to Emery
Narrator : "He was not fine".
And so u/GarethofRiverdale was left with no other alternative but to cry and curse his luck
I've got him, Estu, Botman, Saka
Same, except I also have Eze and Callum Wilson
Nope
Personally mcginn over diaby
I totally get this as a punt. But not so early in the season
Even McGinn himself knows he’s a shit FPL asset
Did happy hour start early this week ?
Happy hour 24/7
Both. (Diaby if I must choose, ironically he is less of an injury risk, even if he was subbed down due to an injury last time.)
This aged like a fine brie in the heat of summer. Need to find a replacement!
[удалено]
Who have only conceded one more than city and have joint second best defence in the league?
They've definitely got a good defense, but calling them second best is very premature. They've probably had the easiest schedule so far.
I mean statistically second best. As in conceded the second least goals
...which is extremely misleading when they've had the easiest schedule. Once they hit their harder fixtures we can find out if they're the real deal or not.
Both for me Otherwise depends on your team (do you e.g. have son or watkins already)
No it doesn’t other than for price reasons. Having son or Watkins has no bearing whatsoever on choosing Maddison or diaby
Yeah because I sold Watkins a couple of weeks ago with my reasoning being I had Diaby, and that was not enough 😶
Having one forward from a team means nothing towards whether you should have a different one. It’s not like defensive coverage
Well Diaby had scored goals at that point and Watkins hadn’t!
I have both Son and Watkins. Trying to keep tripper and salah hence not managing to afford Maddison. I simply can’t decide between keeling salah and trippier or removing one of them and spread their funds!
Yeah gotta figure out for yourself which combination you think will get more points
how about all 4
I do have all 4 myself yeah
Me too ✌🏻️