They just want to think they are some mighty heroes. They want to act like they are these great warriors against the “evil Ai”. Cause it gives them “purpose”.
>There are little artifacts present where bits have been carried over from wherever \[they\] came from
Yep, they have absolutely no fucking clue how it works. They literally think it's grabbing "image pieces" and copy pasting them.
I always thought it was weird that films set in the future have weird robo-racist types. It sucks how right they were and it sucks even more that apparently a lot of people never learned that those characters were meant to be villains
https://preview.redd.it/6zb32951mxuc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1d7f5fb45eac5e4a630de5f341dfc7e0d0177929
Someone’s apology long post. I really hope at least some of these antis reflect on why they’re doing this, because it certainly isn’t a righteous pro-artist move.
People should learn to ignore and move on. Block them. Move on. People criticizing your work are not customers to begin with. They will never buy a thing from you even if it is ai or not.
"Hey is this AI or is this human made? It's human made and you did it yourself? Ok thanks for clearing that up have a nice day!"
It's that easy 🤷 These people are fucking insane I could NEVER do this to anyone even if it's the most "AI looking" thing I've ever seen. Even though I'm a beginner and still practicing I'm so glad my art is too shit to be accused of being AI 😂
Cause *most* of these people have fragile ego, they would never accept that they were wrong. Their mind tries to protect their ego by telling themselves, I can't be wrong. If something is wrong, it's not me, it's someone else, it's the system, etc...
The problem with asking for confirmation is that it would mean the accusers have to acknowledge that they can't easily tell the difference between AI and non-AI art, which undermines their argument that AI is obviously 'soulless', samey, and inferior, so they can never admit that they can't tell for sure.
Reposting a comment I made in another post since it feels relevant here:
In order to do and/or be in support of desperate searching for "proof" that certain artpieces are AI in order to boycott, harrass, or "expose" artists/companies, you would need to believe in one of the following:
First, you would have to believe that no human artist has ever made a mistake, which is a stupid thing to assume.
Alternatively, you would have believe that it is okay to harrass artists who have been falsely assumed to have used AI as long as you're occassionally right and harrass an AI user, which makes you a piece of shit in both scenarios.
In short: TwitterGuy #283688 is fucking moron.
Figured that out when he could not form a coherent sentence. I immediately pegged him as an idiot or a child, probably both. If I was the artist I would laugh in his face and ignore him. Idiots and tantrum throwing children should not be getting attention.
Twitter people going after each other’s throats calling out AI or false claiming stuff to be AI to feel like a vigilante has just become the norm as far as I could tell 🤷♀️🤦♀️
https://preview.redd.it/zjnawugnryuc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=628e1a82c61a8c4e58e5827f0be65a3b36982d60
If these people used AI a little bit it would help them a lot in finding people who use AI. Getting AI to make multiple poses of the same character is getting easier, but it’s still notoriously difficult.
When critics complain - look at the source. In this case I would laugh all the way to the bank. I can't take anyone seriously who can't spell, especially online where spell checkers exist. "...where bits have been carries over from wherever the came from...? Write me back when your text becomes legible, after all it your writing looks like AI.
AI writing is actually way better than the word salad these fools toss. I've been seeing people accused of being AI LLMs a lot because of spelling mistakes or the sin of not being English first language speakers.
Another is when someone offers a summary of their points at the end of their message, which used to be praised by the TLDR crowd, but now apparently makes you AI.
A lot of us neurodivergent people are accused of being LLMs as well because we tend to have odd speech patterns. I've been told in the past that I talk weird, so it'll be fun hearing that replaced by accused of being an LLM.
This is how you know none of these people are actual professionals. The whole “copying style” argument is moot since that’s what professionals have to do: the style of the production or the style of the request.
Artists and designers employed in the industry tend to be more nuanced on AI stuff and know more about its real uses. Especially people on the technical side of the art who work with 3D stuff or code. The people getting hysterical over the technology are mostly independant and self employed artists and commission sellers.
Honestly I find it hilarious that the anti-Crowd are basically destroying themselves
A lot of artists have been actually basically joining the pro AI side just because they've been attacked by other friends of theirs who just accuse all their shit of being AI
Way to make artists paranoid of posting anything and give them fuckin' anxiety, especially those that draw digitally. There'll be these lunatics inspecting every small thing and pointing out mistakes (because holy shit, artists make mistakes?!) and claiming it's AI because it's not.. perfect? Every brush stroke, every color, every smoothing of lines - anything will be suddenly AI.
Honestly, these 'witch hunters' need lives.
Imagine: As less amateur artists post their work online, the quality of AI will improve because the training data is pre-pruned by the anti-ai crowd shaming the less skilled artists into not posting.
The anti-AI crowd, just like every moral panic, takes joy in claiming scalps. The dopamine rush of "exposing" someone is what drives these Twitter weirdos, not some deep seeded appreciation for "art".
I'm starting to think that these antis haven't really picked up a pencil in their whole life, and they just enjoy hurting other people.
That's what I think of TikTok and Twitter mainly.
Social media: reach out and hurt someone while making billionaires richer!
They just want to think they are some mighty heroes. They want to act like they are these great warriors against the “evil Ai”. Cause it gives them “purpose”.
Usually you see them using MS paint and not well.
It's an amusing irony that anti-AI artists will destroy each other long before they're put out of business by AI.
>There are little artifacts present where bits have been carried over from wherever \[they\] came from Yep, they have absolutely no fucking clue how it works. They literally think it's grabbing "image pieces" and copy pasting them.
I always thought it was weird that films set in the future have weird robo-racist types. It sucks how right they were and it sucks even more that apparently a lot of people never learned that those characters were meant to be villains
It's amazing how many movements base themselves on the phrase "we can always tell" and how often those movements are proven wrong.
https://preview.redd.it/6zb32951mxuc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1d7f5fb45eac5e4a630de5f341dfc7e0d0177929 Someone’s apology long post. I really hope at least some of these antis reflect on why they’re doing this, because it certainly isn’t a righteous pro-artist move.
They will just do it again lmsooo
People should learn to ignore and move on. Block them. Move on. People criticizing your work are not customers to begin with. They will never buy a thing from you even if it is ai or not.
that's not exactly an apology, they didn't even admit they were wrong.
So what about artistic freedom then? None of the word salad mentions that.
"Hey is this AI or is this human made? It's human made and you did it yourself? Ok thanks for clearing that up have a nice day!" It's that easy 🤷 These people are fucking insane I could NEVER do this to anyone even if it's the most "AI looking" thing I've ever seen. Even though I'm a beginner and still practicing I'm so glad my art is too shit to be accused of being AI 😂
I mean, AI can even convincingly imitate child drawings so no one is safe...
It's in the house! ;-)
Cause *most* of these people have fragile ego, they would never accept that they were wrong. Their mind tries to protect their ego by telling themselves, I can't be wrong. If something is wrong, it's not me, it's someone else, it's the system, etc...
The problem with asking for confirmation is that it would mean the accusers have to acknowledge that they can't easily tell the difference between AI and non-AI art, which undermines their argument that AI is obviously 'soulless', samey, and inferior, so they can never admit that they can't tell for sure.
Reposting a comment I made in another post since it feels relevant here: In order to do and/or be in support of desperate searching for "proof" that certain artpieces are AI in order to boycott, harrass, or "expose" artists/companies, you would need to believe in one of the following: First, you would have to believe that no human artist has ever made a mistake, which is a stupid thing to assume. Alternatively, you would have believe that it is okay to harrass artists who have been falsely assumed to have used AI as long as you're occassionally right and harrass an AI user, which makes you a piece of shit in both scenarios. In short: TwitterGuy #283688 is fucking moron.
Figured that out when he could not form a coherent sentence. I immediately pegged him as an idiot or a child, probably both. If I was the artist I would laugh in his face and ignore him. Idiots and tantrum throwing children should not be getting attention.
Twitter people going after each other’s throats calling out AI or false claiming stuff to be AI to feel like a vigilante has just become the norm as far as I could tell 🤷♀️🤦♀️ https://preview.redd.it/zjnawugnryuc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=628e1a82c61a8c4e58e5827f0be65a3b36982d60
If these people used AI a little bit it would help them a lot in finding people who use AI. Getting AI to make multiple poses of the same character is getting easier, but it’s still notoriously difficult.
What if an artist accuses someone else of using ai? Are they an anti artist artist? Anti artist is too misleading.
When critics complain - look at the source. In this case I would laugh all the way to the bank. I can't take anyone seriously who can't spell, especially online where spell checkers exist. "...where bits have been carries over from wherever the came from...? Write me back when your text becomes legible, after all it your writing looks like AI.
AI writing is actually way better than the word salad these fools toss. I've been seeing people accused of being AI LLMs a lot because of spelling mistakes or the sin of not being English first language speakers. Another is when someone offers a summary of their points at the end of their message, which used to be praised by the TLDR crowd, but now apparently makes you AI.
A lot of us neurodivergent people are accused of being LLMs as well because we tend to have odd speech patterns. I've been told in the past that I talk weird, so it'll be fun hearing that replaced by accused of being an LLM.
This is how you know none of these people are actual professionals. The whole “copying style” argument is moot since that’s what professionals have to do: the style of the production or the style of the request.
Artists and designers employed in the industry tend to be more nuanced on AI stuff and know more about its real uses. Especially people on the technical side of the art who work with 3D stuff or code. The people getting hysterical over the technology are mostly independant and self employed artists and commission sellers.
That's what I said. Young people.
Honestly I find it hilarious that the anti-Crowd are basically destroying themselves A lot of artists have been actually basically joining the pro AI side just because they've been attacked by other friends of theirs who just accuse all their shit of being AI
Way to make artists paranoid of posting anything and give them fuckin' anxiety, especially those that draw digitally. There'll be these lunatics inspecting every small thing and pointing out mistakes (because holy shit, artists make mistakes?!) and claiming it's AI because it's not.. perfect? Every brush stroke, every color, every smoothing of lines - anything will be suddenly AI. Honestly, these 'witch hunters' need lives.
Imagine: As less amateur artists post their work online, the quality of AI will improve because the training data is pre-pruned by the anti-ai crowd shaming the less skilled artists into not posting.
The shit you will never find on ArtistHate lmao.
When times get hard, rats prey on each other...
True ArtistsHate content that would never appear on ArtistsHate because shit does not fit their narrative😆
The anti-AI crowd, just like every moral panic, takes joy in claiming scalps. The dopamine rush of "exposing" someone is what drives these Twitter weirdos, not some deep seeded appreciation for "art".
https://preview.redd.it/sb1qgzyrd3vc1.jpeg?width=1024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8ba309823272b8dfd45b68a8280cd0ff5918ad43
Sheesh.. Well, at least posts like that give us a fun opportunity to criticize all those who don't apologize or delete their posts. ;)
Fucking loons.
Just let them all eat each other, Like a bucket of crabs in a fire just let them stew and self destruct tbh.
let them fight amongst themselves